ÿWPC ¶¬µôºß$7þó‹™Ît†c“Þ!ÃWá—«#wºØ‹NDþžñì5æ£oŠ8[Ï•»b„ 8CŠLW·ãí2½ÞØ-UÎz^×ø‘Ö=cÜ=S°"šy/™¶N}Úa††ñ~|wíezáèŸfÞ9ŠJ¢'zUøEâ6Z–"/Ч¥¾¶¸ü ½X.ú“–jf'_X_ÓÄM›Ì~%¯YÏÄé]P6·p‰»n,!Ôè\j­â p¨ôb0¯f‹ÕÁS˜£Ž<¦¡Gª!‰àÇÇÖã„M0×whAÁu1_>) Ìn|G¢ ˜'e× × ×  B 0d~88888 0 †¶¶¶¶ 0€<<<<<<<< 0X¼ ˆ#|x «<þ6X9`("Courier 10cpiXôxþ6X@É“8Ç;X@˜HP LaserJet 4ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(>[£$¡¡Ô€ XÛpXXXÔÔ€ Š/Ý‹X XÛpÔ««¬2‰  / / H  H     U¦‹-1mentp‚ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular  AKA meds Kanpsychotropic(ÿÿ$òòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóó(k!2xã$¤¤Ý ƒ[£!ÝÔ€ ˆˆˆ ˆÔÔ€ Šo‹ˆ ˆÔÝ  ÝÓÓ€€€€€òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular GÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ Ð ÑÑ#€º€Xÿÿd#Ñ*Ͼ¦ `CG Times%ô\  `$Times NewRoman<ÿÿ:Default ParaÔ‡XXXÔÔ‡XXXÔô\  `&Times New RomanH dN  íÕ(parparagraph in briefÓÓà  àÓÓV Â,quotesingle space, indentÓÓà8  àÓÓP–É&H3heading, third levelà8 ` àÔ  Ôò òÔ 5Ôó ó(”É&H2à8 ` àÔ  Ôò òÔ 5Ôó óÝ ƒ[£!ÝÔ€ ˆˆˆ ˆÔÔ€ Šo‹ˆ ˆÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÒ°Òò òó óÑ€ŒEÑSIXTH€DISTRICT€APPELLATE€PROGRAMÐ ° ÐÌStaff€AttorneyÌState€Bar€No.€119176Ì100€N.€Winchester€Blvd.,€Suite€310ÌSanta€Clara,€CA€95050Ì(408)€241„6171ÌÌAttorney€for€Appellant,ÌÌÌà@h h àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEAL€OF€THE€STATE€OF€CALIFORNIAˆÌÌà@MM!àSIXTH€APPELLATE€DISTRICTˆÌÌÒ(³KÈ(#(#(ÒPEOPLE€OF€THE€STATE€OF€CALIFORNIA,à€ss1»à)ˆÐ ° Ðà€ss1»à)à @` àˆÌà ` àPlaintiff€and€Respondent,à€ss1»à)ˆÐ ° Ðà€ss1»à)ˆÌà ` àv.à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà€ss1»à)ˆÐ ° Ðà€ss1»à)ˆÌò òó ó,à ` àà€ss1»à)ˆÐ ° Ðà€ss1»à)ˆÌà ` àDefendant€and€Appellant.à À àà€ss1»à)ˆÐ ° ÐÔ‡ XPX‹ ŠoÔÔ‡Xe™XX XPÔ‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚_______________________________________à€yy1»à)ˆÐ ° ÐNo.€H0ÌÔ#†Š¹Ñ‹XXe™ç#ÔÔ#† Šo‹‹Š¹Ñ#ÔÔ‡Šçÿ‹‹ ŠoÔÌCounty€Superior€CourtÏNo.Ð  ð ÐÒ(³KÈ»»(ÒÔ#† Šo‹‹ŠçÿÎ#Ôò òÓ  Óà8 ` àCONFIDENTIAL€EX€PARTE€APPLICATION€FORÐ  ð ÐAUTHORIZATION€OF€EXPERT€FEES;€MEMORANDUM€OFÏPOINTS€AND€AUTHORITIES;€DECLARATION€OFÏATTORNEY€ON€APPEALÐ ` Ð ` Ð  Ðó óÌò òÓÓÓÓà8 ` àTO€THE€HONORABLE€CONRAD€RUSHING,€PRESIDINGÐ  #ð  ÐJUSTICE,€AND€ASSOCIATE€JUSTICES€OF€THE€COURT€OFÏAPPEAL,€SIXTH€APPELLATE€DISTRICT:Ð ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌó óÓRÓà ` àAppellant,€through€his€appointed€counsel,€requests€this€court€authorize€theÐ  'ð"$ Ðexpenditure€of€$1650.00€for€a€psychiatric€expert€to€evaluate€trial€testimony€andÏreports€about€the€incident€giving€rise€to€the€conviction€in€this€case€and€psychiatricÏrecords€of€appellant.€€This€expert€evaluation€is€necessary€to€show€trial€counselÐ  -ð(* ÐÑŒEÑâ âÑÑÑ  ÑÑаÑÑ8€XˆdŠŠd8Ñâ âÑ  Ñprovided€ineffective€assistance€in€failing€to€investigate€mental€health€issues€relevantÐ ° Ðto€a€possible€insanity€defense€and€to€mitigation€at€sentencing.€€This€application€isÏbased€upon€the€record€on€appeal€and€the€attached€òòóódeclarations€of€counsel€and€aÐ ° Ðforensic€psychiatrist.€Ìà ` àTo€protect€the€confidentiality€of€the€factual€information€contained€in€thisÏapplication€and€the€declaration€submitted€herewith,€appellant€requests€this€applicationÏand€declaration€be€filed€under€seal€and€heard€without€service€upon€the€other€partiesÏto€this€proceeding.€€Petitioner€further€requests€that€all€orders€made,€and€all€otherÏdocuments€produced€or€filed€in€connection€with€this€application€be€sealed€and€servedÏonly€upon€counsel€for€petitioner,€with€the€exception€of€orders€clearly€containing€noÏprivileged€information€and€no€information€which€could€lead€to€the€discovery€ofÏprivileged€information.ÌDATED:€December€2,€2003.Ìà ` à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Respectfully€submitted,ÌÌà ` à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à0  àà0h(#(#àSIXTH€DISTRICT€APPELLATE€PROGRAMа"h(#h(# ÐÓ ` ŒX°œXÓÓÓà ` à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€By:€à0 h à€________________________а$ h(#h(# Ðà ` à€€€€€€€€€€€à0 ¸ à€€€€€€€€€€€€à0h¸ (#¸ (#àа%!!h(#h(# ÐÐ  °&"" Ðà ` àò ò€€€òòMEMORANDUM€OF€POINTS€AND€AUTHORITIESóóÐ ° ÐÌà@ÓÓ,àI.ˆÌÌà8 ` àAN€EXPERT€IS€NEEDED€TO€DEMONSTRATE€THATÏCOUNSEL€PROVIDED€INEFFECTIVE€ASSISTANCE€OFÏCOUNSEL€WHEN€HE€FAILED€TO€RETAIN€A€COMPETENTÏPSYCHIATRIST€TO:€1)€EXAMINE€PETITIONER€ANDÏRELEVANT€RECORDS€TO€DETERMINE€WHETHER€HEÏWAS€LEGALLY€INSANE€AT€THE€TIME€OF€THE€CHARGEDÏINCIDENT;€AND,€2)€TO€RENDER€AN€OPINION€WHETHERÏHIS€MENTAL€STATE€AT€THE€TIME€OF€THE€OFFENSEÏPROVIDED€EVIDENCE€IN€MITIGATION€FOR€SENTENCING.Ð ` Ð ` Ð  Ðó óÌÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕñÝà ` àÝ  ÝIn€a€letter€dated€June€17,€2003,€this€Court€asked€appellate€counsel€to€brief€theÏquestion€whether€Petitionerððs€trial€attorney€provided€ineffective€assistance€of€counselÏby€failing€to€investigate€an€insanity€defense.€€The€basis€of€the€courtððs€order€was€aÏdocument€from€Petitionerððs€prison€file€in€which€a€licensed€clinical€social€workerÏwhose€last€name€was€T.€opined€that€Petitionerððs€behavior€at€the€time€of€the€chargedÏoffense€was€influenced€by€mental€illness€and€the€lack€of€proper€medication€at€theÏtime.€€(See€CT€152.)€€T.€further€opined€that€ð ðat€the€time€of€the€incident€[Petitioner]Ïdid€not€understand€the€nature€of€charges.ðð€€(òòIbidóó.)€€T.€explained€that€ð ðit€appears€to€meÐ °  Ðthat€his€level€of€functioning€was€impaired€at€the€time€of€incident€due€to€need€for€re„¼evaluation€of€psych€medications.ðð€€(òòIbidóó.)݃\íÕñ݌Р°$  ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕòÝà ` àÝ  ÝIn€a€supplemental€letter€brief,€appellate€counsel€presented€the€argument€trialÏcounsel€provided€ineffective€assistance€Ô‡Šçÿ‹‹ ŠoÔwhen€he€failed€to€retain€a€psychologist€toÐ °($$ Ðexamine€appellant,€review€medical€records€and€determine€whether€appellant€wasÏinsane€at€the€time€of€the€offense.€€Appellate€counsel€further€argued€trial€counselÐ °,(( Ðprovided€ineffective€assistance€when€he€failed€to€present€mitigating€evidenceÏconcerning€Petitionerððs€mental€illness€at€sentencing.€€However,€Ô#† Šo‹‹ŠçÿÀ#Ôthe€record€on€appealÐ ° Ðdoes€not€adequately€develop€the€facts€supporting€the€claim€of€ineffective€assistanceÏof€counsel€in€failing€to€investigate€an€insanity€defense€and€present€mitigatingÏevidence€at€sentencing.€€While€the€opinion€of€a€licensed€clinical€social€worker€isÏhelpful,€it€is€not€sufficient€to€prove€counselððs€failings€were€prejudicial.€€A€licensedÏclinical€social€worker€does€not€have€the€training€and€expertise€to€render€an€opinionÏon€insanity,€particularly€when€the€claim€is€based€on€inadequate€psychiatricÏmedication.€€Appellate€counsel€needs€the€services€of€an€expert€psychiatrist€to€examineÏthe€trial€record€and€Petitionerððs€psychiatric€records€and€render€an€expert€opinion€onÏwhether€there€was€a€possible€insanity€defense€counsel€failed€to€investigate,€andÏwhether€there€was€mitigating€evidence€counsel€failed€to€present€at€sentencing€inÏsupport€of€a€request€to€dismiss€strike€priors.݃\íÕò݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ[Ýà ` àÝ  ÝAppellate€counsel€has€found€evidence€outside€the€record€on€appeal€supportingÏa€claim€trial€counsel€provided€ineffective€assistance€by€failing€to€investigate€anÏinsanity€defense€and€mitigating€evidence€for€sentencing,€heightening€the€need€for€anÏexpert€to€evaluate€the€issue.€€€Petitioner€has€told€appellate€counsel€he€provided€theÏdocument€authored€by€T.€to€his€trial€counsel€and€asked€him€to€present€an€insanityÏdefense.€€(Declaration€of€Appellate€Counsel,€[ð ðCounsel€declarationðð],€attached€to€thisÏapplication€as€Exhibit€A.)€€€Petitioner€also€told€appellate€counsel€that€about€threeÏweeks€before€the€incident€leading€to€the€charges€in€this€case€his€medication€wasÐ °,(( ÐÔ_Ôchanged.€€He€started€hearing€voices€and€felt€like€he€was€losing€control.€€HeÏcomplained€to€various€guards,€but€nothing€was€done€prior€to€the€incident€leading€toÏthe€battery€charge.€€About€two€weeks€after€the€incident,€his€medication€was€changedÏagain.€€After€that€change,€Petitioner€said€his€condition€improved.€€(CounselÏdeclaration,€ðð€8.)݃\íÕ[ˆ݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ Ýà ` àÝ  ÝPsychiatric€records€appellate€counsel€has€obtained€from€Petitionerððs€prisonÏrecords€support€Petitionerððs€claim€about€the€change€in€his€medication.€€Petitioner€was,Ïand€is,€diagnosed€as€a€paranoid€schizophrenic.€€He€was€prescribed€psychotropicÏmedication€in€prison€for€that€condition.€€Medical€records€show€that€on€June€28,€2001,ÏPetitionerððs€medication€was€changed.€€The€incident€leading€to€the€charges€in€this€caseÏoccurred€on€July€18,€2001.€€According€to€a€report€by€a€prison€guard,€as€Petitioner€wasÏbeing€taken€from€his€cell€after€the€incident,€he€yelled,€ð ðI€want€my€meds.ðð€€On€AugustÏ1,€2001,€Petitionerððs€medication€was€changed€back€to€what€it€was€prior€to€June€28,Ï2001.€€There€is€no€report€in€the€prison€records€of€any€physical€violence€against€guardsÏby€Petitioner€after€August€1,€2001.€€(Counsel€declaration,€ðððð€3,€9.)݃\íÕ 1 ݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕæ#Ýà ` àÝ  ÝAppellate€counsel€has€reviewed€Trial€Counselððs€trial€file.€€Trial€Counselððs€trialÏfile€shows€he€did€nothing€to€investigate€the€possibility€of€an€insanity€defense.€€HeÏfailed€to€obtain€a€release€from€Petitioner€to€examine€Petitionerððs€medical€records€priorÏto€trial.€€Instead,€he€served€a€subpoena€for€those€records,€which€were€delivered€to€theÏcourt€when€the€jury€trial€began.€€It€appears€Trial€Counsel€never€consulted€with€aÏpsychiatrist.€€He€apparently€never€asked€a€psychiatrist€to€examine€Petitionerððs€medicalÐ °,(( Ðrecords,€with€particular€attention€to€the€changes€in€his€medication€treating€hisÏparanoid€schizophrenia.€€He€never€asked€a€psychiatrist€to€evaluate€Petitioner€and€theÏavailable€records€to€determine€whether€an€insanity€defense€was€viable.€€(CounselÏdeclaration,€ðð€6.)€€Appellate€counsel€has€been€unable€to€question€Trial€Counsel€afterÏobtaining€his€trial€file€because€Trial€Counsel€has€failed€to€return€phone€calls€and€hasÏfailed€to€respond€to€a€letter€requesting€his€input.€€Ýƒ\íÕæ#$݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕt(Ýà ` àÝ  ÝIn€January€2003,€Trial€Counsel€told€appellate€counsel€he€did€not€pursue€anÏinsanity€defense€because€Petitioner€asked€him€not€to.€€However,€he€has€not€respondedÏto€subsequent€communication€undertaken€to€determine€why€he€failed€to€at€leastÏinvestigate€the€defense€by€obtaining€pertinent€records€and€consulting€with€an€expert,Ïand€why€he€failed€to€present€what€evidence€he€had€at€sentencing€to€support€a€requestÏthe€court€dismiss€Petitionerððs€strike€priors€in€the€interests€of€justice.€€(CounselÏdeclaration,€ðððð€4„5.)݃\íÕt(¡(݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ +Ýà ` àÝ  ÝThe€available€evidence€suggests€an€insanity€defense€should€have€beenÏinvestigated€by€trial€counsel.€€Schizophrenia€is€a€ð ðpsychosis€characterized€by€theÏbreakdown€of€integrated€personality€functioning,€withdrawal€from€reality,€emotionalÏblunting€and€distortion,€and€disturbances€in€thought€and€behavior.ðð€€(R.€Ô_ÔSbordoneÔ_Ô,ÏPh.D.,€€òòNeuropsychology€for€the€Attorneyóó€(1991),€p.€341.)€€Paranoid€schizophrenia€Ð °&"" Ðis€a€ð ðsubtype€of€schizophrenic€disorder€characterized€by€absurd,€illogical,€andÏchangeable€ideas€of€hallucinations€of€grandeur€and€persecution.ðð€€(òòIdóó.,€at€p.€337.)€€ItÐ °*&& Ðð ðaffects€and€interferes€with€one's€contact€with€reality,€logical€thinking,€and€emotionalÐ °,(( Ðprocesses.ðð€€(òòPeople€v.€Ô_ÔMordÔ_Ôóó€(1988)€197€Cal.App.3d€1090,€1099.)€€ParanoidÐ ° Ðschizophrenia€was€the€diagnosis€which€led€to€a€finding€of€insanity€in€the€seminal€caseÏof€òòPeople€v.€Skinneróó€(1985)€39€Cal.3d€765.€€It€was€also€the€basis€of€a€finding€ofÐ ° Ðinsanity€in€òòPeople€v.€Ô_ÔMordÔ_Ôóó,€òòsupraóó.€€Ýƒ\íÕ +:+݌Р°  ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕS0Ýà ` àÝ  ÝAn€attorney€who€has€a€client€who€has€been€diagnosed€as€a€paranoidÏschizophrenic€and€has€a€report€from€a€licensed€clinical€social€worker€opining€theÏclient€did€not€understand€the€nature€of€his€conduct€at€the€time€of€the€charged€incidentÏshould€investigate€the€possibility€of€an€insanity€defense,€even€if€the€client€opposesÏthat€defense.€€(òòPeople€v.€Ô‡ ˆˆ‹ ŠoÔMozingoóó€(1983)€34€Cal.3d€926Ô#† Šo‹ˆ ˆ 2#Ô.)€€Even€if€an€expertÐ ° Ðconcluded€there€was€insufficient€evidence€to€prove€Petitioner€was€insane€at€the€timeÏof€the€incident,€evidence€of€his€mental€illness€and€the€improper€medication€for€thatÏillness€at€the€time€of€the€incident€would€have€provided€mitigating€evidence€counselÏcould€have€presented€in€asking€the€court€to€exercise€its€discretion€and€dismissÏPetitionerððs€strike€priors€in€the€interests€of€justice.݃\íÕS0€0݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕS4Ýà ` àÝ  ÝAppellate€counsel€has€contacted€Dr.€Expert,€a€forensic€psychiatrist€and€directorÏof€the€Psychiatry€and€the€Law€program€at€the€University€of€California€San€Francisco.€ÏAppellate€counsel€described€the€case,€the€document€authored€by€N.€T.,€and€theÏcontents€of€Petitionerððs€psychiatric€records.€€(Declaration€of€Dr.€Expert€[ð ðExpertÏdeclarationðð],€attached€as€Exhibit€B,€ðððð€4„5.)€€Dr.€Expert€concluded€that,€in€herÏprofessional€opinion,Ô‡ XPX‹ ŠoÔÔ‡X¾î XX XPÔ݃\íÕS4€4݌Р°*&& ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚aÂÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÑ  ÑÓ?+Ü Ü4Œ ä <”ìDœôL¤ü!` ŒX?ÓÔ#†Šçÿ‹ XX¾îh6#ÔÔ#† Šo‹‹Šçÿ‡6#ÔÔ‡Šçÿ‹‹ ŠoÔÝ‚aÂñ6Ýà8 ` àÝ  ÝMr.€Petitionerððs€mental€state€at€the€time€he€engaged€in€the€conductÐ °,(( Ðleading€to€the€charges€in€his€case€should€have€been€investigated.€Ð °-)) ÐPeople€with€psychotic€illnesses€frequently€suffer€psychiatric€symptomsÏthat€impair€their€ability€to€correctly€interpret€and€respond€to€reality.€€AÏchange€in€medication,€if€not€properly€monitored,€could€exacerbateÏpsychotic€symptoms.€€Since€Mr.€Petitioner€was€diagnosed€with€aÏpsychotic€illness€(paranoid€schizophrenia),€if€he€was€experiencingÏsymptoms€typically€caused€by€this€illness€his€ability€to€correctlyÏevaluate€and€respond€to€reality€should€have€been€considered€by€his€trialÏattorney.€€If€he€was€experiencing€psychotic€symptoms€at€the€time€of€theÏcharged€incident,€his€mental€state€could€possibly€have€supported€anÏinsanity€defense€at€his€trial.€€Even€if€his€mental€state€did€not€rise€to€theÏlevel€of€an€insanity€defense,€it€should€have€been€presented€atÏsentencing€as€evidence€in€mitigation.€€Someone€who€engages€inÏcriminal€conduct€while€experiencing€psychotic€symptoms€that€affectÏhis€ability€to€correctly€evaluate€and€respond€to€reality€is€less€culpableÏthan€someone€who€suffers€no€mental€illness.Ô#† Šo‹‹Šçÿ¯7#Ô€€(Expert€declaration,€ðð€6.)݃aÂñ6Î7݌а` Ð ` Ð  ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÌÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ3=Ýà ` àÝ  ÝThe€posture€of€this€case€is€similar€to€Ô‡ ˆˆ‹ ŠoÔòòPeople€v.€Mozingoóó,€òòsupraóó,€34€Cal.3d€926.€Ð ° ÐMozingo€was€convicted€of€rape€and€murder€with€special€circumstances€and€sentencedÏto€death.€€In€conjunction€with€his€appeal€he€filed€a€habeas€corpus€petition€arguing€hisÏtrial€counsel€had€Ô#† Šo‹ˆ ˆ±=#Ôprovided€ineffective€assistance€by€failing€to€investigate€a€defense€ofÐ ° Ðinsanity€and€diminished€capacity€and€by€failing€to€present€evidence€of€mental€illnessÏin€mitigation€at€sentencing.€€Prior€to€trial,€counsel€had€received€prison€records€fromÏthe€prosecutor€which€ð ðwould€alert€a€reasonably€competent€attorney€to€investigateÏpossible€mental€defenses.ðð€€(òòIdóó.,€at€p.€932.)€€Counsel€did€not€do€so€because€defendantÐ °" Ðrefused€to€enter€an€insanity€plea€and€told€counsel€he€would€not€submit€to€anyÏpsychiatric€evaluations.݃\íÕ3=`=݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕfAÝà ` àÝ  ÝThe€Supreme€Court€found€counsel€had€provided€ineffective€assistance€byÏfailing€to€investigate€Mozingoððs€mental€illness.€€Mozingo€had€been€diagnosed€as€aÏparanoid€schizophrenic.€€Two€experts€in€the€habeas€proceeding€opined€Mozingo€hadÐ °,(( Ðexperienced€a€ð ðÔ_ÔdissociativeÔ_Ô€reactionðð€during€the€killing,€a€state€which€ð ðwould€fallÏwithin€the€legal€definition€of€insanity.ðð€€(òòIdóó.,€at€p.€933.)€€The€Supreme€Court€adoptedÐ ° Ða€refereeððs€finding€that€Ýƒ\íÕfA“A݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚aÂÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚aÂDÝà8 ` àÝ  Ýð ðtrial€counsel€Ô‡ ˆˆ‹ ŠoÔrendered€inadequate€representation€in€failing€toÐ °  Ðinvestigate€possible€diminished€capacity€or€insanity€defenses,€to€requestÏappointment€of€a€psychiatrist,€and€to€introduce€at€the€penalty€phaseÏevidence€of€defendant's€mental€condition€as€a€mitigating€circumstance.Ï.€.€.€€[Ô_ÔC]ounselÔ_Ô's€inadequate€representation€thereby€deprived€defendantÏof€a€potentially€meritorious€defense€or€mitigating€circumstance.Ô#† Šo‹ˆ ˆlD#Ôðð€Ð °  Ð(òòIbidóó.)݃aÂD0D݌а ` Ð ` Ð  ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÌÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕîFÝà ` àÝ  ÝThe€Supreme€Court€also€held€counselððs€omission€was€not€excused€becauseÏÔ_ÔMozingoÔ_Ô€opposes€entering€an€insanity€plea.€€The€clientððs€opposition€was€notÏdeterminative€because€counsel€had€failed€to€conduct€sufficient€investigation€toÏadequately€inform€Ô_ÔMozingoÔ_Ô€concerning€the€viability€of€that€defense.€€ð ðððÔ‡ ˆˆ‹ ŠoÔBy€hisÐ ° Ðinaction,€deliberate€or€otherwise,€counsel€deprived€himself€of€the€reasonable€basesÏupon€which€to€reach€informed€tactical€and€strategic€trial€decisions.ðððð€(òòIdóó.,€at€p.€934,Ð ° Ðquoting€òòPeople€v.€Ô_ÔFriersonÔ_Ôóó€(1979)€25€Cal.3d€142,€163.)€€Faced€with€initial€oppositionÐ ° Ðfrom€the€client,€counsel€should€have€ð ðÔ_Ôundertak[enÔ_Ô]€sufficient€investigation€of€possibleÏdefenses€to€enable€counsel€to€present€an€informed€report€and€recommendation€to€hisÏclient.ðð€€(òòIbidóó.)݃\íÕîFG݌Р°$  ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ„KÝà ` àÝ  ÝThe€record€in€this€appeal€parallels€the€record€in€òòÔ_ÔMozingoÔ_Ôóó.€€As€in€òòÔ_ÔMozingoÔ_Ôóó,€priorÐ °&"" Ðto€trial€counsel€received€records€which€would€have€alerted€a€reasonably€competentÏattorney€to€investigate€possible€mental€defenses,€specifically€an€insanity€defense.€ÏTrial€Counsel,€Petitionerððs€trial€counsel,€has€told€appellate€counsel€he€did€not€pursueÐ °,(( Ðan€insanity€defense€because€Petitioner€opposed€it.€€Even€assuming€this€is€true€(whichÏPetitioner€adamantly€denies),€counsel€was€ineffective€by€failing€to€conduct€anyÏinvestigation€which€would€enable€him€to€ð ðpresent€an€informed€report€andÏrecommendation€to€his€client.ðð€€(òòIbidóó.)€€He€failed€to€obtain€Petitionerððs€medicalÐ °  Ðrecords€prior€to€trial.€€He€failed€to€seek€appointment€of€a€psychiatrist€to€evaluateÏPetitioner€and€the€recordsÔ#† Šo‹ˆ ˆ»H#Ô€and€determine€whether€an€insanity€defense€was€viable.€Ð °  ÐFurthermore,€he€failed€to€present€any€mitigating€evidence€concerning€PetitionerððsÏmental€illness€when€the€trial€court€considered€whether€to€dismiss€any€of€PetitionerððsÏstrike€priors€in€the€interests€of€justice.€€(See€RT€1023.)݃\íÕ„K±K݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕQÝà ` àÝ  ÝThis€is€an€issue€which€can€be€presented€adequately€only€in€a€habeas€corpusÏpetition.€€The€appellate€record€does€not€sufficiently€ð ðdisclose€what€[]€evidence€wasÏavailable€that€was€not€presented,€or€what€reasons€defense€counsel€may€have€had€forÏnot€presenting€it.ðð€€(òòPeople€v.€Andersonóó€(2001)€25€Cal.4th€543,€598.)€€To€show€in€aÐ ° Ðhabeas€corpus€petition€what€evidence€was€available€that€was€not€presented,€appellateÏcounsel€needs€the€services€of€a€psychiatrist.€€Only€an€expert€psychiatrist€canÏdetermine€the€significance€of€Petitionerððs€diagnosis€as€a€paranoid€schizophrenic€andÏthe€probable€effects€of€a€change€in€his€medication.€€Only€such€an€expert€can€provideÏa€basis€to€show€there€was€a€viable€insanity€defense.€€An€expert€can€also€explain€whatÏmitigating€evidence€would€have€been€available€at€sentencing€to€persuade€a€judge€toÏâ âdismiss€strike€priors€in€the€interests€of€justice.݃\íÕQ/Q݌Р°*&& ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕAUÝà ` àÝ  ÝAppellate€counsel€has€contacted€an€expert€forensic€psychiatrist,€Dr.€Expert,€theÏâ âdirector€of€the€Program€at€the€University.€€Dr.€Expert€has€indicated€that€she€and€oneÏof€her€two€students,€both€of€whom€are€also€psychiatrists,€could€review€the€transcriptsÏin€this€case€and€Petitionerððs€medical€and€prison€records€to€determine€the€impact€of€hisÏmental€illness€on€his€conduct€at€the€time€of€the€charged€battery.€€(Expert€declaration,Ïðððð€2„3.)€€After€hearing€a€synopsis€of€Petitionerððs€case€and€the€contents€of€his€medicalÏrecords,€Dr.€Expert€believed€trial€counsel€should€have€investigated€PetitionerððsÏmental€state€at€the€time€he€engaged€in€the€conduct€leading€to€the€battery€charge.€€(òòIdóó.,Ð ° Ðat€ðð€6.)€€She€estimates€it€would€take€approximately€11€hours€to€review€relevantÏportions€of€the€trial€transcripts€and€Petitionerððs€medical€and€prison€records€andÏprepare€a€report.€€The€doctors€charge€$150.00€per€hour€for€their€services.€€(òòIdóó.,€at€ððÐ ° Ð7.)€€Thus€appellant€requests€this€court€approve€the€expenditure€of€up€to€$1,650.00€toÏpay€Dr.€Expert€and€either€Dr.€ñ ñA€ñ ññ ñKan€ñ ñor€Dr.€ñ ñB€ñ ññ ñKuo€ñ ñto€review€documents€and€prepare€a€reportÏconcerning€the€relationship€between€Petitionerððs€documented€mental€illness€and€hisÏconduct€at€the€time€of€the€charged€battery.݃\íÕAUnU݌Р °  ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ;[Ýà ` àÝ  Ýà@©©,àò òII.ó ó݃\íÕ;[h[ÝŒˆÐ ° ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÌÝ‚m”ÉÿÝÝ  ÝÝ‚m”Éú[Ýà8 ` àÔ  Ôò òÝ  ÝTHIS€COURT€IS€STATUTORILY€AND€CONSTITUTIONALLYÐ ° ÐOBLIGATED€TO€PROVIDE€FUNDS€FOR€ANCILLARYÏDEFENSE€SERVICES,€INCLUDING€EXPERT€FEES,€NEEDEDÏTO€ASSURE€EFFECTIVE€LEGAL€REPRESENTATION.݃m”Éú[\ÝÔ 4\ԌР` Ð ` Ð  ÐŒó óÝ  ÝÌà ` àPenal€Code€section€1241€provides,€in€part:ÌÌÝ‚aÂÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚aÂœ]Ýà8 ` àÝ  ÝIn€any€case€in€which€counsel€other€than€a€public€defender€has€beenÏappointed€by€the€Supreme€Court€or€by€a€court€of€appeal€to€represent€aÏparty€to€any€appeal€or€proceeding,€such€counsel€shall€receive€aÏreasonable€sum€for€compensation€and€necessary€expenses,€the€amountÏof€which€shall€be€determined€by€the€court€and€paid€from€any€€fundsÏappropriated€to€the€Judicial€Council€for€that€purpose.݃aÂœ]É]݌Р` Ð ` Ð  ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÌÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÆ_Ýà ` àÝ  ÝThe€language€of€this€statute€is€very€similar€to€that€of€Penal€Code€€sectionÏ987.2,€subdivision€(a),€which€provides€that€counsel€other€€than€the€public€defenderÏappointed€to€represent€a€defendant€in€the€€municipal€or€superior€court€"shall€receiveÏa€reasonable€sum€for€compensation€and€for€necessary€expenses,€the€amount€of€whichÏshall€€be€determined€by€the€court,€to€be€paid€out€of€the€general€fund€of€the€county."݃\íÕÆ_ó_݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕñaÝà ` àÝ  ÝThe€California€Supreme€Court€has€held€that€Penal€Code€sections€987€andÏ987.8€imply€that€indigent€defendants€have€the€right€to€court„ordered€defense€services,Ïincluding€experts.€€(òòCoronevsky€v.€Superior€Court€óó(1984)€36€Cal.3d€307,€€320;€òòSandÐ °# Ðv.€Superior€Court€óó(1983)€34€Cal.3d€567,€575,€fn.€3.)€€Penal€Code€section€982.8,Ð °%!! Ðsubdivision€(g)(1),€defines€the€"legal€assistance"€€furnished€by€courts€to€indigentÏdefendants€as€"legal€counsel€and€supportive€services,€including,€but€not€limited€to,Ïâ âmedical€and€€psychiatric€examinations,€investigative€services,€expert€testimony,€orÐ °+'' Ðany€other€form€of€services€provided€to€assist€the€defendant€in€the€preparation€andÏpresentation€of€the€defendant's€case."݃\íÕñabÝŒÌâ âŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ’eÝà ` àÝ  ÝMoreover,€both€the€California€Supreme€Court€and€the€United€€States€SupremeÏCourt€have€recognized€that€indigent€defendants€have€€a€due€process€right€to€the€basicÏtools€of€an€adequate€defense,€€including€not€only€counsel,€but€expert€and€otherÏservices€as€needed.€€(òòAke€v.€Oklahoma€óó(1985)€470€U.S.€68,€76„78;€òòCoronevsky,Ð °  Ðsupra,óó€36€Cal.3d€at€pp.€319„320.)€The€California€Supreme€Court€has€stated€inÐ °  ÐòòCoronevskyóó€and€other€cases€that€a€defendant's€constitutional€right€to€effective€counselÐ ° Ðunder€both€the€state€and€federal€constitutions€also€includes€the€right€to€reasonablyÏnecessary€ancillary€defense€services.€(U.S.€Const.;€Amends.€VI€and€€XIV;€Cal.ÏConst.,€Art.€I,€ðð15:€òòCoronevskyóó,€òòsupraóó,€at€p.€319;€òòKeenan€€v.€Superior€Court€óó(1982)Ð ° Ð31€Cal.3d€424,€428.)݃\íÕ’e¿e݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ…iÝà ` àÝ  ÝThe€California€Supreme€Court€has€also€held€that€the€constitutional€right€toÏancillary€services€extends€to€defendants€appealing€their€convictions.€(òòIn€re€Ô_ÔKetchelÔ_ÔóóÐ ° Ð(1968)€68€Cal.2d€397,€398,€400„401.)€€In€òòÔ_ÔKetchelÔ_Ôóó,€the€court€affirmed€an€order€by€theÐ °  Ðsuperior€court€€requiring€the€warden€of€San€Quentin€to€permit€the€examination€of€theÏdefendant€by€a€psychiatrist€selected€by€his€appellate€counsel.€€In€response€toÏarguments€by€the€Attorney€General€that€such€an€examination€could€serve€no€purposeÏon€appeal€because€the€scope€of€€inquiry€on€appeal€is€limited€to€the€record,€the€courtÏnoted€the€usefulness€of€a€psychiatric€examination€because€it€could€assist€appellateÏcounsel€in€determining€whether€trial€counsel€had€rendered€effective€assistance€andÐ °,(( Ðcould€lead€to€possible€bases€for€collateral€attack€on€the€defendant's€conviction.€(òòIdóó.,Ð ° Ðat€p.€401.)݃\íÕ…i²i݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕnÝà ` àÝ  ÝThe€importance€of€investigation€in€developing€the€evidence€which€the€habeasÏcorpus€petitioner€needs€to€prevail€on€his€claims€is€illustrated€in€various€cases€in€whichÏhabeas€corpus€relief€has€been€granted€to€convicted€defendants€on€the€strength€ofÏevidence€developed€by€investigation€after€trial.€€(òòIn€re€Corderoóó€€(1988)€46€Cal.3dÐ °  Ð161;€òòIn€re€Martin€óó(1987)€44€Cal.3d€l;€òòIn€re€Ledesma€óó(1986)€43€Cal.3d€171;€òòPeopleÐ °  Ðv.€Ô‡ ˆˆ‹ ŠoÔMozingoóó,€òòsupraóó,€34€Cal.3d€926;Ô#† Šo‹ˆ ˆ3p#Ô€òòIn€re€Hallóó€(1981)€30€Cal.3d€408.)€Ýƒ\íÕn.n݌Р° ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕqÝà ` àÝ  ÝUnder€these€principles,€a€court€that€appoints€counsel€to€represent€a€petitionerÏon€appeal€should€provide€ancillary€services,€including€experts€and€investigators,Ïwhen€the€record€on€appeal€provides€a€strong€basis€to€believe€trial€counsel€providedÏineffective€assistance€of€counsel€in€failing€to€investigate€a€viable€defense.€€This€courtÏspecifically€asked€appellate€counsel€to€address€the€question€of€ineffective€assistanceÏof€counsel€in€failing€to€present€an€insanity€defense.€€Asking€counsel€to€make€thisÏargument€without€providing€the€means€to€determine€whether€an€insanity€defense€wasÏtruly€viable€would€make€the€courtððs€request€for€supplemental€briefing€a€matter€ofÏform€without€substance,€giving€the€client€the€surface€appearance€of€representationÏwithout€providing€his€counsel€access€to€"the€raw€materials€integral€to€the€€buildingÏof€an€effective€defense."€(òòAke€v.€Oklahoma,€supraóó,€470€€U.S.€at€p.€77.)݃\íÕq=q݌Р°($$ ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕHuÝà ` àÝ  ÝFunds€should€be€authorized€so€that€appellate€counsel€can€retain€a€forensicÏpsychiatrist€to€evaluate€the€transcripts€in€this€case€and€available€records€and€reportsÐ °,(( Ðto€determine€whether€trial€counsel€provided€ineffective€assistance€by€failing€toÏinvestigate€whether€there€were€grounds€to€present€an€insanity€defense€at€trial,€and€byÏfailing€to€present€evidence€of€Petitionerððs€psychiatric€condition€as€mitigation€atÏsentencing.€€Appellate€counsel€will€use€the€expertððs€opinion€to€support€a€habeasÏcorpus€petition€on€the€issue€of€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel.݃\íÕHuuu݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝDATED:€€€December€2,€2003.ÌÌà ` à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€SIXTH€DISTRICT€APPELLATE€PROGRAMÌÓ ` ŒXÜÜŒXÓà ` à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àBy:€à0 À à€________________________аÀ(#À(# Ðà ` à€€€€€€€€€€€à0 ¸ à€€€€€€€€€€€€à0h¸ (#¸ (#àà0Àh(#h(#àAppellate€CounselаÀ(#À(# Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAttorney€for€Appellant€Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à€€PetitionerÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÐ  ° ÐØØò òà ` à€€€à0 ¸ àòòDECLARATION€OF€APPELLATE€COUNSELа¸ (#¸ (# ÐóóÌó óÓÓà ` àI,€Appellate€Counsel,€declare:Ð ° Ðà ` àI€am€an€attorney€licensed€to€practice€in€the€courts€of€the€€State€of€California.€ÏI€am€the€attorney€for€appellant€under€appointment€by€this€court.ÌÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ |Ýà ` àÝ  Ý1.€€On€June€17,€2003,€the€court€of€appeal€asked€me€to€file€a€supplemental€letterÏbrief€concerning€whether€trial€counsel€provided€ineffective€assistance€ð ðby€failing€toÏinvestigate€and/or€present€the€defense€of€not€guilty€by€reason€of€insanity€due€toÏdefendantððs€under„medication€for€paranoid€schizophrenia€at€the€time€of€the€offense.ðð݃\íÕ |8|݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕï}Ýà ` àÝ  Ý2.€€I€had€been€considering€that€question€since€I€first€reviewed€the€record€onÏappeal€and€noticed€the€document€which€gave€rise€to€the€courtððs€concern.€€I€alsoÏnoticed€there€was€no€request€in€the€record€on€appeal€for€the€appointment€of€aÏpsychiatrist€to€examine€Petitioner.€€On€September€4,€2002,€I€wrote€to€trial€counsel,Ïasking€for€his€entire€file€in€Petitionerððs€case.€€In€the€ensuing€months€I€occasionallyÏcalled€trial€counsel€but€was€never€able€to€reach€him€personally.€€I€left€messagesÏasking€him€to€call€me.݃\íÕï}~݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕƒ€Ýà ` àÝ  Ý3.€€In€the€meantime,€in€November€2002€I€asked€€Petitioner€to€sign€a€release€soÏI€could€obtain€his€prison,€medical€and€psychiatric€records€from€the€CaliforniaÏDepartment€of€Corrections.€€Using€the€release€signed€by€Petitioner,€I€obtained€thoseÏrecords€in€early€January€2003.݃\íÕƒ€°€݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ"‚Ýà ` àÝ  Ý4.€€On€January€14,€2003,€I€left€trial€counsel€another€message€asking€him€to€callÏme.€€On€January€16,€2003,€trial€counsel€returned€one€of€my€calls€for€the€first€time,€butÐ °,(( ÐI€was€not€in€the€office€to€take€his€call.€€On€January€31,€2003,€I€was€finally€able€toÏspeak€personally€with€trial€counsel,€Petitionerððs€trial€counsel€because€he€was€in€hisÏoffice€when€I€called€him.€€He€said€before€Petitionerððs€trial€he€had€received€a€copy€ofÏthe€report€stating€that€at€the€time€of€the€charged€crime€Petitioner€did€not€understandÏthe€nature€of€the€charges.€€Trial€counsel€told€me€he€did€not€present€an€insanity€defenseÏbecause€Petitioner€told€him€he€did€not€want€to€rely€on€an€insanity€defense.€€IÏreminded€trial€counsel€that€I€had€requested€his€trial€file€the€previous€September.€€HeÏpromised€to€send€it€to€me.݃\íÕ"‚O‚݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕç…Ýà ` àÝ  Ý5.€€On€February€10€I€wrote€trial€counsel€a€letter€reminding€him€of€his€promiseÏto€send€me€his€trial€file.€€I€also€asked€him€why€he€made€no€use€of€Petitionerððs€medicalÏrecords€at€sentencing,€particularly€to€request€the€dismissal€of€Petitionerððs€strike€priors.€ÏDuring€the€ensuing€months€I€left€a€few€phone€messages€for€trial€counsel.€€He€calledÏback€one€time,€on€April€8,€2003,€leaving€me€a€message€when€I€was€not€in€the€office.€ÏI€have€been€unable€to€speak€with€trial€counsel€personally€since€our€conversation€onÏJanuary€31,€2003.€€Other€than€the€call€on€April€8,€he€has€not€returned€any€of€myÏphone€calls,€nor€has€he€responded€to€letters€written€on€February€10€and€June€26,Ï2003.݃\íÕç…†݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ#‰Ýà ` àÝ  Ý6.€€In€May€or€June€2003€trial€counsel€finally€sent€me€his€trial€file.€€When€IÏreviewed€the€file€I€discovered€that€trial€counsel€made€no€effort€to€obtain€PetitionerððsÏmedical€and€psychiatric€records€prior€to€the€trial.€€Instead,€on€February€15,€2002,€tenÏdays€before€trial€was€scheduled€to€begin,€he€prepared€and€served€a€subpoena€to€haveÐ °,(( Ðthe€records€brought€in€person€to€the€trial€court€at€the€time€of€trial.€€I€also€found€noÏevidence€of€any€effort€to€consult€with€a€psychiatrist€concerning€Petitionerððs€mentalÏillness€and€its€possible€effect€on€Petitioner€at€the€time€of€the€battery.݃\íÕ#‰P‰݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕŒÝà ` àÝ  Ý7.€€On€September€23€I€visited€Petitioner€at€Pelican€Bay€State€Prison€to€discussÏpotential€habeas€issues.€€Petitioner€denied€refusing€to€plead€not€guilty€by€reason€ofÏinsanity.€€He€said€he€had€personally€given€trial€counsel€a€copy€of€the€document€whichÏstated€that€at€the€time€of€the€incident€he€did€not€know€the€nature€of€the€charges.€ÏBased€on€some€cases€he€had€read€in€the€prison€library,€Petitioner€said€he€asked€trialÏcounsel€to€present€an€insanity€defense.€€Petitioner€said€trial€counsel€was€initiallyÏreceptive,€and€told€Petitioner€he€would€have€to€see€a€psychiatrist.€€Petitioner€told€meÏhe€had€no€problem€with€that,€particularly€since€he€had€been€evaluated€by€psychiatristsÏseveral€times€in€prison.€€However,€trial€counsel€never€sent€a€psychiatrist€to€seeÏPetitioner.݃\íÕŒ@Œ݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ¨Ýà ` àÝ  Ý8.€€Petitioner€further€told€me€that€the€medication€prescribed€to€treat€his€mentalÏillness€had€been€changed€two€or€three€weeks€prior€to€the€incident€which€gave€rise€toÏthe€battery€charge.€€The€change€was€detrimental.€€He€started€hearing€voices€andÏfeeling€out€of€control.€€He€complained€about€his€medication€to€Ô% € Ôvarious€guards,€butÏnothing€was€done€prior€to€the€incident.€€Two€weeks€after€the€incident€giving€rise€toÏthe€battery€charge,€Petitionerððs€medication€was€changed€again,€and€his€conditionÏâ âimproved.݃\íÕ¨Õ݌Р°*&& ÐŒÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕ]’Ýà ` àÝ  Ý9.€€After€visiting€Petitioner,€I€reviewed€his€psychiatric€records€and€found€theyÏâ âsubstantiated€his€claim€about€the€change€in€his€medication.€€Petitionerððs€medicalÏrecords€showed€he€routinely€received€medication€for€his€mental€illness,€which€wasÏdiagnosed€as€paranoid€schizophrenia.€€On€June€28,€2001,€his€medications€wereÏchanged.€€The€incident€leading€to€the€battery€charge€occurred€on€July€18,€2001.€€OnÏAugust€1,€2001,€Petitionerððs€medication€was€changed€again.€€Prison€records€IÏreviewed€also€reported€that€as€Petitioner€was€led€from€his€cell€on€July€18,€2001,€heÏyelled,€ð ðI€want€my€meds.ðð݃\íÕ]’Š’݌̌ÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕÿÝÓÓÝ  ÝÝ‚\íÕR•Ýà ` àÝ  Ý10.€€In€November€2003,€I€began€searching€for€an€expert€who€could€evaluateÏthe€trial€transcripts€and€Petitionerððs€records,€including€the€records€of€his€psychiatricÏmedication,€and€consider€whether€there€would€have€been€grounds€for€an€insanityÏdefense€or€at€least€a€basis€to€present€mitigating€evidence€at€sentencing.€€I€spoke€withÏDr.€Emily€A.€ñ ñKeramñ ññ ñExpertñ ñ,€a€forensic€psychiatrist€who€is€the€director€of€the€ñ ñPsychiatry€andÏthe€Law€ñ ñProgram€at€theÏUniversityñ ñ€of€California€San€Franciscoñ ñ.€€After€hearing€an€outline€of€Petitionerððs€case,€Dr.€ñ ñKeramñ ññ ñExpertñ ñ€told€me€in€herÏopinion€trial€counsel€should€have€investigated€Petitionerððs€mental€health€at€the€timeÏof€the€battery.€€She€agreed€that€she€would€supervise€one€of€her€two€students,€who€areÏboth€licensed€psychiatrists,€in€reviewing€pertinent€records€and€preparing€a€reportÏconcerning€Petitionerððs€mental€state€at€the€time€of€the€battery.€€Dr.€ñ ñKeramñ ññ ñExpertñ ñððsÏdeclaration,€her€curriculum€vitae€and€those€of€her€students,€are€attached€to€thisÏapplication€for€expert€funds.݃\íÕR••݌̌ÓÓÝ  Ýà ` àI€declare€under€penalty€of€perjury€that€the€foregoing€is€true€and€correct.Ð °,(( Ðà ` àExecuted€this€December€4,€2003,€at€Santa€Clara,€California.ÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à0 À à______________________аÀ(#À(# Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAppellate€Counselò òó óñ ñÐ  ° ÐÑ8€˜ˆˆdXˆd8ÑÑ  Ñà@ÛÛ)àò òòòEXHIBIT€AˆÐ  ° Ðà@áá)àEXHIBIT€Bóóó óñ ññ ñÐ ° Ðñ ñ