WPC BLski(a lq|=u *_HBYؤ:Qm:OcN3ZSaaJ7$G$險NKhzGZvLR!Eb@ˡ+{r#?n,EÅtjOc{U7t-U0ut{Rʿh! W`vQ*/_7gp7J8΄}JҙSiI Xb7 ZD[lk8 @#Ф~>SR`*3(1ܹ#=(k0oPFUō?xɍMMt%~3'%q/J8]7Rt+3 ei(>-\r|D#!UN %' 0(-UxNU^ w@4 m+N3M5 019 0=j 0 0>o 0 0w 0+ 0a 0@ 0 09 0 0: 02 0) 0% 0_ 0   0k 0~ B*E D3o C D+ 0 0 06 0 0: 0h  0FuU6U>U*/MY 0] 0V 0O H Z r     0N@NbtHP LaserJet 5Si,,,,0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularX($(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular5(.8 EDww w w w w wN7:i+003|x U #0.Normal<:Definition T<GD:Definition L , ;1` hp x (#;  8.` hp x (#886Definition('z&H1      XXX(o&H2  XXX(o&H3  XXX(&H4 XXX XXX(o&H5  XXX(o&H6  XXX20Address8SP6Blockquote , , ;1` hp x (#;   8.` hp x (#842Emphasis,*CITE,dl*CODEK.<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXS/\  `&Times New RomanS6&)4Hyperlink            <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard K.<6X9`(Courier NewK XXXS/\  `&Times New RomanS<:Preformatted/%  ,Kk (#/K.<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXS/\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk (#/<:zBottom of I$%4$ ** ddI  B    ?0%2A`Arial?9&%*  dd9  XXXS/\  `&Times New RomanS  &0 d d####'dxddd'dxd<:zTop of ForI$%4$** ddI  B    ?0%2A`Arial?9&%*  dd9  XXXS/\  `&Times New RomanS  0Kl.SampleK.<6X9`(Courier NewKS/\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterK.<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXS/\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable:8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  <6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial2cc0Style18  XXX?0%2A`Arial?  ?0%2A`Arial?XXX2cc0Style20  XXX?0%2A`Arial?  ?0%2A`Arial?XXX2cc0Style15  XXX?0%2A`Arial?  ?0%2A`Arial?XXXWAIVERMOOTNESS:STANDING:STANDARDPREJUDICE:WRITS:OTHER:STANDING:(O$WAIVERMOOTNESS:STANDARDPREJUDICE:WRITS:OTHER: !  _X0EXXXXX0E8UdXdd8   APPELLATEPROCEDURE   APPEALABILITY4> =O  5  WAIVER#!+#!#X0EXJ#XX0E6=O  7 A  4< =O  5  STANDING6W=Ok  7  #X0EX#XX0E#!y#!  #X0EX6##XUdXXX0Ex#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0E 4? =O  5   _MOOTNESS_ 66=OJ  7 L x    К#!##XUdX!#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0E 4@ =O  5   STANDARDOFREVIEW 6=O  7 ,    К#!p##XUdX!#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0E 4A =O  5   PREJUDICE 6=O-  7 2 [    К#!##XUdX!#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0E 4B =O  5   WRITS 6v=O  7 V    К#!3##XUdX!R#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0E 4C =O  5   OTHERR:#! ##XUdX! #X0EXXXUdXX0E 6 =O   7      APPEALABILITY  Mustfilenoticeofappealwithin60days.(InreRyanR.(2005)122Cal.App.4th   595,597600[dismissappealwhennoticefiledmorethan60daysafterterminationofparentalrightswhereparentwasnotpresentandnoticeofthedecisionandappellaterightswassenttothewrongaddress];InreCaseyD.(1999)70Cal.App.4th38,5354;  InreJulieM.(1999)69Cal.App.4th41,47;Inre_Cathina_ԀW.(1998)68Cal.App.4th  716,719724[parentsresponsibilitytofilenoticeofappeal];Inre_Devin_ԀM.(1997)58  Cal.App.4th1538,1541;Inre_Meranda_ԀP.(1997)56Cal.App.4th1143,1150[evenif  IACclaimed,unlesswouldviolatedueprocess];StevenJ.v.SuperiorCourt(1996)35  Cal.App.4th798,812;InreMeganB.(1991)235Cal.App.3d942,950.)The60days  forfilinganappealgenerallystartstheday(after)theoralorderismadeincourt.(Inre  _Alyssa_ԀH.(1994)22Cal.App.4th1249,1254[noconstructivefiling];Inre_Markaus_ԀV.  (1989)211Cal.App.3d1331,1337[butorderdismissingdependencyiseffectiveuponfilingthewrittenorder];Inre_Tanyann_ԀW.(2002)97Cal.App.4th675,678[butfactual  findingmorethan60daysbeforefilingnoticeofappeal_reviewable_Ԁwhenthefinalorderwasmadefromtheappealedorder].)  Section395providesinrelevantpart:AjudgmentinaproceedingunderSection300maybeappealedfrominthesamemannerasanyfinaljudgment,andanysubsequentordermaybeappealedfromasfromanorderafterjudgment#! #!#X0EX #XX0E...#!C#!Ԁ.#X0EX#XX0E#!#!Ԁ#X0EX#Ԛ#XUdXXX0ER#X0EXXXUdXX0EAconsequenceof ! section395isthatan_unappealed_Ԁdispositionalor_postdispositional_Ԁorderisfinalandbindingandmaynotbeattackedonappealfromalaterappealableorder.#!##XUdX!#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0E(InreJesse # W.(2001)93Cal.App.4th349,355.)An#!S##XUdX!r#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀappealfromthemostrecentorderina $  dependencymattermaynotchallengeearlierordersforwhichthetimeforfilinganappealhaspassed.#!%#!#X0EXD#XX0E(Ibid.)#!*##XUdX!l#!XXUd!ԀPermittingaparenttoraiseissuesgoingtothevalidityofa &"" finalearlierappealableorderwoulddirectlyunderminedominantconcernsoffinalityandreasonableexpectation,includingthepredominantinterestofthechildanstate#!#!#X0EX#XX0E...#!L##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ. ($$ (Inre_Janee_ԀJ.(1999)74Cal.App.4th198,207.)Accordingly,Byfailingtoappeal,[the )%% parent]haswaivedanycomplaintshemayhaveregardingthe[reunification]planasordered.(InreJulieM.(1999)69Cal.App.4th41,47.)(SaraM.v.SuperiorCourt +'' (2005)36Cal.4th998,#X0EX#XX0E#!#!1018.)    Anoticeofappealistimely,thoughfiledmorethan60daysaftertheappealableorder,ifitisfiledwithin20daysofanotherfilinganoticeofappeal.(#!8#InreP.C.(2006)  137Cal.App.4th279,!#X0EX#XX0E286.)  #!##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0E  Under#!E#!#X0EXd#XX0ECaliforniaRulesofCourt,rule#!##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ1416(b)(3),whenarefereedecidesmost   matters,theorderisfinaltendaysaftersendingacopyoftheorderwithexplanationstothejudge.Anoticeofappealfiledlessthan60daysfromthenistimely.(InreManuel   E.(2004)120Cal.App.4th521,537538.)     Denialofrehearingbyajudgeiseffectivewhenthejudgesignstheorder,notwhentheclerkpreparestheminuteorder.(InreB.A.(2006)141#X0EX #XX0ECal.App.4th#X0EX"#XX0E1411,   14181420.)#X0EX##XX0E#!~ #!  Anappellantcannotattackappealableordersnotappealedfrom. Ourjurisdictiononappealislimitedinscopetothenoticeofappealandthejudgmentororderappealedfrom.(_Polster_,Inc.v.Swing(1985)164Cal.App.3d427,436.)  #!###XUdX!##!XXUd!  Dependencyproceedingsareproceedingsofanongoingnature.Whiledifferent  hearingswithinthedependencyprocesshavedifferentstandardsandpurposes,theyarepartoftheoverallprocessandongoingcase.(SheilaS.v.SuperiorCourt(2000)84  Cal.App.4th872,878879,quotingInreMarilynH.(1993)5Cal.4th295,307.)  #!%#!#X0EXl%#XX0E  Ifanorderisappealable,however,andnotimelyappealistakentherefrom,the  issuedeterminedbytheorderareresjudicata.(InreMatthewC.(1993)6Cal.App.4th  386,393.) Anappealfromthemostrecentorderenteredinadependencymattermaynotchallengepriororders,forwhichthestatutorytimeforfilinganappealhaspassed.(InreMeganB.(1991)235Cal.App.3d942,950.)Thus, anunappealeddispositionor  postdispositionorderisfinalandbindingandmaynotbeattackedonanappealfromalaterappealableorder.(InreMerandaP.(1997)56Cal.App.4th1143,1150.)Failure   totimelyappealanappealableorderwaivestheclaim.(InreMelvinA.(2000)82 ! Cal.App.4th1243,1251;#!t'##XUdX!'#!XXUd!ԀInreDanielK.(1998)61Cal.App.4th661,668[failureto " appealorderdenyingdiscoverywaivedtheissue#!+#!#X0EX+#XX0E].)#!e,#!#X0EX,#XX0E # #!,##XUdX!.-#!XXUd!  Mustfileanoticeofappealwithin60daysunder#!-#!#X0EX-#XX0EWelfareandInstitutionsCode %!! section#!H.##XUdX!.#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ395. Thisstatutemakesthedispositionalorderinadependencyproceedingthe &"" appealablejudgment.[Citation.]Therefore,allsubsequentordersaredirectlyappealablewithoutlimitation,exceptforpost1994orderssettinga.26hearingwhenthecircumstancesspecifiedinsection366.26,subdivision(  l0  ),exist.[Citations.]A )%% consequenceofsection395isthatanunappealeddispositionorpostdispositionorderisfinalandbindingandmaynotbeattackedonanappealfromalaterappealableorder. +'' [Citations.](InreMerandaP.(1997)56Cal.App.4th1143,1150;accord,InreNada  R.(2001)89Cal.4th1166,11781179;WadaB.SuperiorCourt(1996)41Cal.App.4th  1391,13951396#!(/#!#X0EXG/#XX0E;see#! 3#InreZethS.(2003)31Cal.4th396,!413414.) CodeCivilof  Proceduresection906,whichappliesindependencycases[citation],states:Uponanappeal[fromafinaljudgmentora_postjudgment_Ԁorder],thereviewingcourtmayreviewtheverdictordecisionandanyintermediaterulings,proceeding,orderordecisionwhichinvolvesthemeritsornecessarilyaffectsthejudgmentororderappealedfromorwhichsubstantiallyaffectstherightsofaparty....(InreBrittanyS.(1993)17Cal.App.4th   1399,1404.)#!3##XUdX!M3#X0EXXXUdXX0E  Thewaiverruleasappliedindependencycasesflowsfromsection395,underwhichthedispositionalorderisanappealablejudgment,andallsubsequentordersaredirectlyappealablewithoutlimitationexceptforpost1994orderssettinga.26hearing,whicharesubjecttowritreview([former]_rule_Ԁ39.1B)andrelatedlimitations(366.26,subd.(l)).Aconsequenceofsection395isthatan_unappealed_Ԁdispositionalor  _postdispositional_Ԁorderisfinalandbindingandmaynotbeattackedonappealfromalaterappealableorder.(Inre_Meranda_ԀP.(1997)56Cal.App.4th1143,1150;Inre_Janee_  J.(1999)74Cal.App.4th198,206.)Inotherwords,Achallengetothemostrecent  orderenteredinadependencymattermaynotchallengepriorordersforwhichthestatutorytimeforfilinganappealhaspassed.(SteveJ.v.SuperiorCourt(1995)35  Cal.App.4th798,811.)Theruleservesvitalpolicyconsiderationsofpromotingfinalityandreasonableexpedition,inacarefullybalancedlegislativescheme,andpreventinglatestagesabotageoftheprocessthroughaparentsattackonearlierorders.(Inre  _Janee_ԀJ.,supra,atp.207.)(InreJesseW.(2001)93Cal.App.4th349,355;accord,In  reJessicaG.(2001)93Cal.App.4th1180,11901191[appointmentofguardianadlitem  withoutdueprocesspermitschallengingordersnotimmediatelyappealed;otherwise,aCatch22].)#!c6#!  Hearingnotspecifiedinthenoticeofappealarenotappealable.(InreBrittanyK.   (2005)127Cal.App.4th1497,#!=#!#X0EX6#XX0E15021503[althoughnoticeofappealspecifiedthe388 ! petition,itwasfiledmorethan60daysafterthedenialofthepetition,soitwasnolongerappealable];InreBrandonM.(1997)54Cal.App.4th1387,14001401;InreMelvinA. # (2000)82Cal.App.4th1243,1251;InreMelvinJ.(2000)81Cal.App.4th742,753 $  [delinquency];InreDanielD.(1994)24Cal.App.4th1823,18311834;seeNormanI. %!! _Krug_ԀRealEstateInvestments,Inc.v._Praszker_(1990)220Cal.App.3d35,47[noticeof &"" appeallimitedtoordersofspecifieddateinsufficienttogiveappellatecourtjurisdictionoverothermatters]#!>#!#X0EX>#XX0E;butseeInreMadisonW.(2006)141#!SB#!#X0EXB#XX0ECal.App.4th#!C##XUdX!EC#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ1447,14491451 ($$ [noticeofappealfiledwithin60daysofdenialof388petitionwhichspecifiedonlythe366.26hearingincludedthedenialofthe388petition];InreBabyBoyV.(2006)140 *&& #!C#!#X0EXC#XX0ECal.App.4th#!E##XUdX!VE#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ1108,1115[noticeofappealvalidthoughitdidnotexpresslystatetheorder +'' terminatingparentalrightswasbeingappealedfrom];InreJosiahS.(2002)102  Cal.App.4th403,418[thoughnoticeofappealnotspecifydenialofsection388hearing,itisappealableaspartofthesamehearingorproceeding];InreDanielZ.(1992)10  Cal.App.4th1009,1017[noticeofappealliberallyconstrued;noticespecifyingthedispositionalhearingdeemedtoincludethejurisdictionalhearing];Civ.Code,3528[ Thelawrespectformlessthansubstance.].)  Theparentshouldsignthenoticeofappeal,especiallywhentheparentwasabsentfromthehearingbeingappealedfrom.(InreStevenH.(2001)86Cal.App.4th1023,   1029;InreSeanS.(1996)46Cal.App.4th350,352353;InreAlmaB.(1994)21   Cal.App.4th1037,1043;butseeInreHelenW.(2007)150#X0EXE#XX0ECal.App.4th#X0EX"J#XX0EԀ71,#!E#!#X0EXoJ#XX0E80[attorney   whosignednoticeofappealwaspresumedtobeauthorizedtodosounlesstherewasevidencetothecontrary];InreAsiaL.(2003)107Cal.App.4th498,505[okaywhen   clientwenttothehearing,thoughleftearly,andappellateattorneysubmittedadeclarationsayingcommunicatedwithclientwhowishedtheappeal];InreMalcolmD.  (1996)42Cal.App.4th904,910[attorneypresumedauthorizedtoactforclient];Inre  JaimeR.(2001)90Cal.App.4th766,772[ Itispresumedthatcounselactedwith  appellantsauthority.].)    Jurisdictionalfindingsappealedfromthedispositionalorder.(InreAthenaP.  (2002)103#!J#Cal.App.4th!Ԁ617,624[thejurisdictionalorderis_interlocuatory_,soreview  whenappealthedispositionalorder;InreSheilaB.(1993)19Cal.App.4th187,196;In  re_Tacy_ԀZ.(1987)195Cal.App.3d107,112.)#!N##XUdX!J#!XXUd!  #!=P##XUdX!P#X0EXXXUdXX0E  Thedispositionalorderisafinalorderandisappealableunlessreunification  servicesaredeniedandthematterissetforapermanencyplanhearing.(_Welf_.&Inst.Code,395;InreMelvinA.(2000)82Cal.App.4th1243,1250;InreDanielK.(1998)  61Cal.App.4th661,668[ Thefirstappealableorderinthedependencyprocessisthedispositionalorder.];InreBenjaminE.(1996)44Cal.App.4th71,76[same];Inre   WandaB.(1996)41Cal.App.4th1391,13931396[orderdenyingservicesbutnot ! setting_PPH_Ԁisappealable].) Thetermjudgmentinthestatute[_Welf_.&Inst.Code,395]referstothedispositionalorderinadependencyproceeding.(InreAaronR. # (2005)130Cal.App.4th697,702.)#!P#!#X0EXP#XX0EԀ $  #!T##XUdX!)U#X0EXXXUdXX0E  Theparentmustsignthenoticeofintenttofilejuvenilewrit.(JaniceJ.v. &"" SuperiorCourt(1997)55Cal.App.4th690,692;SuzanneJ.v.SuperiorCourt(1996)46 '## Cal.App.4th785,788.)#!U#!#X0EXU#XX0E  Whennotice[ofthewritrequirement]isnotgiven,theparentsclaimsoferroroccurringatthesettinghearingmaybeaddressedonreviewfromthedisposition +'' followingthesection366.26hearing.(Inre_Harmony_ԀB.(2005)125Cal.App.4th831,  #!W#!#X0EXEW#XX0E838;seealsoWelf.&Inst.Code,366.26,subd.(l)(3)(A);#!X#InreMerrickV.(2004)122  Cal.App.4th235,!#X0EX&Y#XX0E248249[thoughclerkstranscriptsaidparentwasadvised,court  permittedraisingissuesbecausesuchanadvisementwasnotinthereporterstranscript];InreAthenaP.(2002)103#!Y#Cal.App.4th!Ԁ617,625[whenset_PPH_Ԁandnotgivenoticeof  writrequirement,canraiseissuesatthenextappealableorder(usuallythe_PPH_)];Inre   MariaS.(2000)82Cal.App.4th1032,1038;Inre_Rashad_ԀB.(1999)76Cal.App.4th442,   447448;Inre_Cathina_ԀW.(1998)68Cal.App.4th716,719724,726.)Parentcanraise   issuesfromtheterminationordenialofservicesifthecourtofappealsummarilydeniesatimelywritpetition.(InreKennethM.(2005)123Cal.App.4th16,18,fn.2.)     Collateralordersmadewhilesettingpermanentplanhearingareunappealable;thepartymustfileawritpetition.(InreTabithaW.(2006)143#!\[#!#X0EX7Z#XX0ECal.App.4th#!_##XUdX!a_#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ811,815817;   Inre_Rashad_ԀB.(1999)76Cal.App.4th442,447448;AnthonyD.v.SuperiorCourt   (1998)63Cal.App.4th149,153156;butseeInreNatashaA.(1996)42Cal.App.4th28,  3334[visitation].)  #!_#Ordersnotsignedbycommissionersarenotvoidorvoidableandmustbe  appealedinatimelymanner.(InreJesseW.(2002)93Cal.App.4th349,356.)!    Treatedhabeaspetitionafterdeadlineforextraordinarywritpassedasmotionforrelieffromdefault.(InreEmmanuelH.(2001)92Cal.App.4th150,151152.)    UnderFamilyCodesection7894,subdivisions(b)and(c)cancontestonappealonlyinsufficiencyoftheevidenceorevidentiaryerrorfromprivateadoption;legalityofdefaultjudgmentnotgrounds.(Adoptionof_Clarissa_ԀH.(2003)105Cal.App.4th120,  122.)#!/b#  Apermanentprotectiveorderunderthe!WelfareandInstitutionsCodeis   appealableunder#!d#!CodeofCivilProceduresection#!Ue#!Ԁ904.1,#!e#!subdivision#!f#!Ԁ(a)(6)asan ! injunction.(InreCassandraB.(2004)125Cal.App.4th199,208209[butthenoticeof " appealmust#!Mf#Ԁbefiledwithin60daysunder!Cal.RulesofCourt,rule1435(f)andformer # rule39].)#!Mg#!#X0EX_#XX0E $    Underthedisentitlementdoctrine,aparentcannotappealwhilehehasabscondedwiththeminor. Itisillogicalandinequitableforappellanttoseekappellatereviewoftheveryorders[theappellant]blatantlyviolated.(#!g#MacPhersonv.MacPherson(1939) ($$ 39Cal.2d271,277[tookkidsoutofcountryduringdivorce];#XUdX!h#!XXUdԀGuardianshipofMelissa )%% W.(2002)96Cal.App.4th1293,12991300[guardianswhokidnappedminorand *&& arrangedforhermarriagewhileappealingreturninghertoparent];!InreKameliaS. +'' (2000)82Cal.App.4th1224,1227;#!j#!AdoptionofJacobC.(1994)25Cal.App.4th617,  623624[parentwhostolekidlackedstanding];#!k#butseeInreClaudiaS.(2005)131  Cal.App.4th236,245[notapplywhenparentfleeswithchildrenafterbeingtoldCPSconsideringfilingapetitionbutnopetitionfiledyet]!#X0EX j#XX0E;KathrynS.v.SuperiorCourt  (2000)82Cal.App.4th958[canappealaftertheminorisreturned].)  Thoughminordidnotfileanoticeofappeal,andthusistherespondent,willconsiderminorsobjectiononappeal.(#!m#!InreJaysonT.(2002)97Cal.App.4th75,#!n#!83[p.   87:Welf.&Inst.Code,317permitsminorsattorneytopresentnewevidencetothecourtofappeal],disapprovedonothergroundsin#!o#!InreZethS.(2003)31Cal.4th396,   #!o#!413414;InreJeremyS.(2001)89Cal.App.4th514,527,disapprovedonothergrounds   in#!p#!InreZethS.(2003)31Cal.4th396,#!5q#!413414.)   #!q#!#X0EX[m#XX0E  Noissueinopeningbriefamountstoanabandonment.(InreSadeC.(1996)13   Cal.4th952;InreSaraH.(1997)52Cal.App.4th198,200202;CherlyS.v.Superior  Court(1996)51Cal.App.4th1000[writs].)  #X0EXEr#XX0E#!r#!% 5 WAIVER%5t:  #!s#!#X0EXs#XX0E  Failingtoobjectgenerallyservesasawaiver.(InreDakotaS.(2000)85  Cal.App.4th494,502[listing];InreLorenzoC.(1997)54Cal.App.4th1330,13381339  [listing];InreMichelleM.(2000)80Cal.App.4th1139,1148,fn.7.)    Itisunfairtothetrialcourtandtheadversepartytogiveappellateconsiderationtoanallegedproceduraldefectwhichcouldhavebeenpresentedto,andmaywellhavebeencuredby,thetrialcourt.[Citation.]IfweweretoexaminetheissuenowraisedbytheDepartment,wewouldineffectsanctionapracticeofallowingapartytokeepitslegalcontentionssecretduringtrialandlaterpursueatheoryonappealnevertenderedtothetrialcourt.(SteveJ.v.SuperiorCourt(1995)35Cal.App.4th798,810811.)  #!ot#  Butanissueisnotwaived,thoughappellantdidnotraiseitbelow,whenthecourt  hadtheopportunityordidaddresstheissuebecausethepolicyofwaiveristonotbeabletoraiseissuesonappealwithoutgivingthecourttheopportunitytocorrectit.(!Inre ! S.M.(2004)118Cal.App.4th1108,#!y#Ԁ1121,fn.9.)#XUdX!t#!XXUd! "   [T]hedoctrineofinvitederrorapplieswhereaparty,fortacticalreasons,persuadesthetrialcourttofollowaparticularprocedure.Thepartyisestoppedfromclaimingthattheprocedurewasunlawful.(InreJaimeR.(2001)90Cal.App.4th766, &"" 772.)#X0EXKz#XX0E#!jz#!  FailingtoobjecttowhetherCPSmetitsburdenofproofatahearingdoesnot )%% waiveanissue.(InreBrianP.(2002)99Cal.App.4th616,623[adoptability];Code *&& Civ.Proc,647.) +'' Ї  Failingtoobjecttoevidencewaivestheissue.(InreClaraB.(1993)20  Cal.App.4th988,1000;InreMarkC.(1992)7Cal.App.4th433,446[admissibilityof  psychologicalreport].)  Failingtoobjecttodeficienciesinthesocialworkerreportwaivestheissue.(In  reDakotaS.(2000)85Cal.App.4th494,501502[assessmentoftheadoptingparent];In   re_Urayna_ԀL.(1997)75Cal.App.4th883,8785887[adoptionassessment];InreCrystal   J.(1993)12Cal.App.4th407,411413[adoptionassessment];InreCatherineS.(1991)   230Cal.App.3d1253,1258[denyreunificationservices];InreJannileeT.(1992)3   Cal.App.4th212,222[insufficientevidencetodenyservices];butseeInrePreciousJ.   (1996)42Cal.App.4th1463,14751476[noinformationatall];KatherineS.v.Superior   Court(2000)82Cal.App.4th958,973[same];#!4|#!#X0EX{#XX0EInreRebeccaH.(1991)227Cal.App.3d   825[psychologistnotqualifiedtodenyservices].)  Failingtoobjecttonoattorneyinchambersduringminorstestimonywaivestheissue.(InreGilbertoM.(1992)6Cal.App.4th1194,1200;butseeInreLauraH.  (1992)8Cal.App.4th1689.)  Nowaiverwhenapurequestionoflaw.(InreJasmineC.(1999)74Cal.App.4th  198,208209;InreDamonteA.(1997)57Cal.App.4th897,899.)    Thereshouldbenowaiverifitisnotcleartheconductwouldresultinwaiver.(Peoplev.Champion(1995)9Cal.4th879,908,fn.6.)  #!#!% 7 STANDING:%7p    Standingtoappealisjurisdictional.(InreHarmonyB.(2005)125Cal.App.4th  831,837;#!Q#accord,InreFrankL.(2000)81Cal.App.4th700,703.)!#X0EX+#XX0E Inordertoasserta  claimoferror,appellantmustdemonstratethatshewasaggrievedbytheallegederror.(#!#InreS.C.(2006)138Cal.App.4th396,!#X0EX؆#XX0E414.)     BlacksLawDictionarydefinesstandingasapartysrighttomakealegalclaimorseekjudicialenforcement.#!Ӈ#!#X0EX#XX0E...#!##XUdX!<#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀAlsotermedstandingtosue.(BlacksLawDict.(8th " ed.2004)p.1442,col.1.)Alitigantsstandingtosueisathresholdissuetoberesolvedbeforethemattercanbereachedonthemerits.[Citation.]#!#!#X0EXʼn#XX0E...#!##XUdX!B#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀWewillnotaddressthe $  meritsoflitigationwhentheplaintifflacksstanding,because Californiacourtshavenopower#!#!#X0EXˋ#XX0E...#!##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀtorenderadvisoryopinionsorgivedeclaratoryrelief.[Citation.]Standing  &"" goestotheexistenceofacauseofaction.[Citation.](5Witkin,Cal.Procedure(4thed.1997)Pleading,862,p.320.)[]#!O#!#X0EXn#XX0E...#!##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ[] Standingrequirementswillvaryfrom ($$ statutetostatutebasedupontheintentoftheLegislatureandthepurposeforwhichtheparticularstatutewasenacted.[Citation.](Blumhorstv.JewishFamilyServicesofLos *&& Angeles(2005)126Cal.App.4th993,10001001.)(Librersv.Black(2005)129 +'' Cal.App.4th114,124.) Standingisapartysrighttomakealegalclaimandisathresholdissuetoberesolvedbeforereachingthemeritsofanaction.(Saidv._Jegan_  (2007)146#!^#!#X0EX}#XX0ECal.App.4th#!H##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ1375,1382.)  Ѐ#!#!#X0EX#XX0E  Tohavestanding,thepartymusthaveabeneficialinterest.(AssociatedBuilders  &Contractors,Inc.v.SanFranciscoAirportsCom.(1999)21#!#!#X0EX#XX0ECal.4th#!##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ352,361362;   _Syngenta_ԀCropProtection,Inc.v._Hellker_(2006)138#!g#!#X0EX#XX0ECal.App.4th#!f##XUdX!ਖ#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ1135,1182;see#!#!#X0EX7#XX0ECode   Civ.Proc,#!##XUdX!̗#!XXUd!Ԁ1086;CommonCausev.BoardofSupervisors(1989)49#!x#!#X0EXY#XX0ECal.3d#!##XUdX!8#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ432,439.)     Onlythepartyaggrieved,theoneharmed,mayappeal.(CodeCiv.Proc,902;#!#In   reDanielM.(2003)110Cal.App.4th703,!#X0EX™#XX0E709;InreCarissaG.(1999)76Cal.App.4th   731,734;InreNachelleS.(1996)41Cal.App.4th1557,1560.)#!Ț#Ԁ [T]ohavestandingon   appeal,apersongenerallymustbebothapartyofrecordandsufficientlyaggrievedbythejudgmentororder.(Marshv.MountainZephyr,Inc(1996)43Cal.App.4th289,   295.)Apartyisnotaggrievedbyajudgmentororderrenderedinitsfavor.(Nevada  CountyOfficeofEd.v.Riles(1983)149Cal.App.3d767,779.)    Generally,aparentwhoisanaggrievedpartymayappealajudgmentinajuveniledependencymatter.[Citation.]Tobeaggrieved,apartymusthavealegallycognizableinterestthatisinjuriouslyaffectedbythecourtsdecision.[Citation.](Inre  BarbaraR.(2006)137Cal.App.4th941,953;accordInreH.G.(2006)146!#X0EX #XX0ECal.App.4th#!##XUdX![#!XXUd  1,9.)  Foranappellant [t]ohavestanding,apersonmusthaverightsthatmaysuffer  injury.(InreP.L.(2005)134Cal.App.4th1357,1361.) Oneisconsideredaggrieved  whoserightsorinterestsareinjuriouslyaffectedbythejudgment.[Citations.]Appellantsinterestmustbeimmediate,pecuniary,andsubstantial,andnotnominaloraremoteconsequenceofthejudgment.[Citation.](CountyofAlamedav.Carleson  (1971)5Cal.3d730,737;accordAjidaTechnologies,Inc.v.RoosInstruments,Inc.  (2001)87Cal.App.4th534,540.) [A]tothequestionwhoisthepartyaggrieved,the  test!#X0EX˟#XX0E...#! ##XUdX!N#!XXUdԀseemstobethemostclearandsimplethatcouldbeconceived.Wouldtheparty   havehadthething,iftheerroneousjudgmenthadnotbeengiven?Iftheanswerbeyea, ! thenthepersonisthe partyaggrieved.Buthisrighttothethingmustbeimmediate,andnottheremoveconsequenceofthejudgment,haditbeendifferentlygiven.(Adams # v.Woods(1857)8Cal.306,315.)(Cookv.Contreras(2002)95Cal.App.4th1194, $  1201,emphasisinoriginal.)  Onecanbeapartyaggrievedandthushavestandingonappeal,evenifonelackedstandinginsuperiorcourt.(InreCatherineH.(2002)102Cal.App.4th1284,1294.) '## !  Joinderisallowedifinterestsofthepartiesinterwoven.(InrePatriciaE.(1985) )%% 174Cal.App.3d1,6;seeInreFrankL.(2000)81Cal.App.4th700,702704.) *&&  +''   Weliberallyconstruetheissueofstandingandresolvedoubtsinfavoroftherighttoappeal.(#!ݦ#InreL.Y.L.(2002)101Cal.App.4th942,!948;accord,_Ajida_  Technologies,Inc.v._Roos_ԀInstruments,Inc.(2001)87#!#Cal.App.4th!Ԁ534,540.)    Standing:Anonpartyhasstandingtoappealwhenheorshewouldbeboundbyresjudicata.(Marshv.MountainZephyr,Inc.(1996)43Cal.App.4th289,295;seealso   CountyofAlamedav._Carleson_(1971)5#!#!#X0EX#XX0ECal.3d#!,##XUdX!n#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ730,736.)Apersonhasstandingon   appealtocontestwhetherhadstandinginthesuperiorcourt.(InreCatherineH.(2002)   102Cal.App.4th1284,1294;InreStewart(1969)276#!٫#Cal.App.2d!Ԁ211,215;Ginsberg   TileCo.v._Faroane_(1929)99#!-#!Cal.App.381,389?)#!ۭ#!#X0EX#XX0E   #!0#!#X0EXr#XX0E  Standing:Whenapartyclaimsthereisaconflictofinterestinapublicinterestlawfirmwithdifferentdivisionsrepresentingdifferentparties,thefirmhasstanding.(In   reJasmineS.(2007)153#!ɮ#!#X0EX #XX0ECal.App.4th#!?##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ835,841842[ChildrensLawCenter];InreMark   B.(2007)148#!#!#X0EX#XX0ECal.App.4th#!##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ61,67[Sacramento].)  #!a#!  Waiver:#!#Theissueofstandingiswaivedwithoutraisingitintherespondents  brief.(InreS.M.(2004)118Cal.App.4th1108,1115,fn.3;InreChristopherI.  (2003)106Cal.App.4th533,548,fn.1.)!#X0EX#XX0E  % 6 _MOOTNESS_:%6  Dismissalofdependencymatterdoesnotmakeinitialassumptionofjurisdictionmoot.(InreJoelH.(1993)19Cal.App.4th1185,1193[thoughminorwasreturnedto  theparent,thejurisdictionalfindingwouldaffectfuturedependencies];InreJoshuaC.  (1994)24Cal.App.4th1544[anappealfromthedismissalorderatthedispositionalhearingremovingthechildfromoneparentandplacingitwiththeotherwasnotmoot];butsee#!>#InreMichelleM.(1992)8Cal.App.4th326,327328!Ԁ[appealofdispositional  orderchangingcustodytotheotherparentbecamemootwhensubsequentdismissalofthedependencywasnotappealed].)  Appealbecomesmootaftertrialcounselstipulatedtothefindingsatasubsequenthearing.(Inre_Dani_ԀR.(2001)89Cal.App.4th402,405406[stipulationatdependent # reviewthatwouldbedetrimentalforminortobeathomeandvisitationappropriatewaivestheseappealoftheseordersfromthedispositionalhearing];InreEricaA.(1999) %!! 73Cal.App.4th1390,13941395[stipulatedatdependentreviewthattherearereasonsforremoval];butseeInreJenniferV.(1998)197Cal.App.3d1206,12091210[stipulate '## todispositionalhearingnotwaivejurisdiction].) ($$   Appealinggrantingmorereunificationservicesbecomemootbecausetheserviceswerealreadygiven;thecourtofappeal cannotrescindservicesthathavealreadybeen +'' _#receivedbytheparents.(InrePabloD.(1998)67Cal.App.4th759,761;butseeInre  AlvinR.(2003)108Cal.App.4th962,974[notmootbecausecouldleadtoterminationof  parentalrights(whethertherewasreasonableservices)];#!L#InreChristinaA.(2001)91  Cal.App.4th1153,1158[notmootbecauseaffected!#X0EX#XX0Esubsequentcourtrulings].)    Failuretoholdcontestedhearingdoesnotbecomemootwhencourtsubsequentlygrantsacontestedhearingifitcannotbedeterminedwhetherthecontestedhearingencompassedthesameissues.(InreJosiahS.(2002)102Cal.App.4th403,415416.)     Failuretoappealafterterminationofparentalrightsmakespriorappealsmoot.#!i#!#X0EX#XX0E(#X0EXݿ##XUdXXX0E#X0EXXXUdXX0EInreJessicaK.(2000)79Cal.App.4th1313,13161317;InreMelissaS.(1986)179   Cal.App.3d1046;InreLisaM.(1986)177Cal.App.3d915,920; InreAlbertG.(2003)   113Cal.App.4th132,135[relativesappealforplacementbecamemootafterterminationofparentalrights].)#!C##XUdX!b#X0EXXXUdXX0E     Detentionorderalwaysmoot?(SeeInreRaymondG.(1991)230Cal.App.3d  964,967.)  Contestingguardianshipbecomesmootwhenminormarries(orbecomesadultorisemancipated).(#!'#!GuardianshipofMelissaW.(2002)96Cal.App.4th1293,#!#!12991300.)    Issueofplacementnotmootwhenminorwasreturnedtoparentsbecausetheminorcouldberemovedagainandpriordeterminationthatarelativewasnotfitwoulddisqualifytherelativefromplacement.(InreManuelE.(2004)120Cal.App.4th521,  #X0EXF##XUdXXX0E#X0EXXXUdXX0E550.)  #!#!#X0EX#XX0E% 8 STANDARD%8ԀOFREVIEW:  #!%#  Thereisnoblanketexceptiontotheruleforjuveniledependencyappeals.  Reviewofsuchappealsisgovernedbygenerallyapplicablerulesofappellateprocedure,withproperdeferencetobepaidtothefactualfindingsanduncontestedrulingsofthejuvenilecourt,andallappropriateinferencestobedrawninfavorofthejudgmentbelow.(Inre_##Zeth_##ԀS.(2003)31Cal.4th396,405.) # !#!#  Theappropriatetestforabuseofdiscretionis whetherthetrialcourtexceededthe %!! boundsofreason.Whentwoormoreinferencescanbereasonablydeducedfromthefacts,thereviewingcourthasnoauthoritytosubstituteitsdecisionforthetrialcourt.(InreStephanieM.(1994)7Cal.4th295,318319.)However,findinganabuseof ($$ discretiononlyinthosecircumstancesinwhichthejudgeactedarbitrarily,capriciouslyorwhimsicallywouldbemisleadingsince itimpliesthatineverycaseinwhichatrialcourtisreversedforanabuseofdiscretionitsactionwasutterlyirrational.(Cityof +'' _##Sacramentov.Drew(1989)207Cal.App.3d1287,1297.)Rather,the scopeof  discretionalwaysresidesintheparticularlawbeingapplied,i.e.,inthelegalprinciplesgoverningthesubjectof[the]action#XUdX!g#...!XXUd[Citationsomitted.]!(Ibid.)#!<#Ԁ Actionthat  transgressestheconfinesoftheapplicableprinciplesoflawisoutsidethescopeofdiscretionandweshallcallsuchactionanabuseofdiscretion.!(Ibid.)#!T#Ԁ  !  Injuvenilecases,asinotherareasoflaw,thepowerofanappellatecourtasked   toassesssufficiencyoftheevidencebeginsandendwithadeterminationastowhetherornotthereisanysubstantialevidence,whetherornotcontradicted,whichwillsupporttheconclusionofthetrieroffact.AllconflictsmustberesolvedinfavoroftheRespondentandalllegitimateinferencesindulgedintoupholdtheverdict,ifpossible.Wherethereismorethanoneinferencewhichcanbereasonablydeducedfromthefacts,theappellatecourtiswithoutpowertosubstituteitsdeductionsforthoseofthetrieroffact.(InreKatrinaC.(1988)201Cal.App.3d540,547;accord,InreDiamondH.   (2000)82Cal.App.4th1127,1135.)#!#  Theissueofsufficiencyoftheevidenceindependencycasesisgovernedbythe  samerulesthatapplytootherappeals.Ifthereissubstantialevidencetosupportthefindingsofthejuvenilecourt,weupholdthosefindings.(InreBrandonC.(1999)73  Cal.App.4th1530,1534.)Wedonotevaluatethecredibilityofwitnesses,reweightheevidence,orresolveevidentiaryconflicts.Rather,wedrawallreasonableinferencesinsupportofthefindings,considertherecordmostfavorablytothejuvenilecourtsorder,andaffirmtheorderifsupportedbysubstantialevidenceevenifotherevidencesupportsacontraryconclusion.(InreAutumnH.[(1994)]27Cal.App.4th[567,]576.)The  appellanthastheburdenofshowingthefindingororderisnotsupportedbysubstantialevidence.(InreGeoffreyG.(1979)98Cal.App.3d412,420.)(InreL.Y.L.(2002)  101Cal.App.4th942,947.)  Abuseofdiscretionoftenequivalenttosubstantialevidence.(InreRobertL.  (1993)21Cal.App.4th1057,1066.)  Substantialevidencetestdescribed.(InreRubieselaE.(2000)85Cal.App.4th " 177,184195[notreweightheevidence];InreJasmineC.(1999)70Cal.App.4th71,75 # [ofsolidvalue];InreRobertL.(1993)21Cal.App.4th1057,1067[equivalenttoabuse $  ofdiscretiontest].)Theappellatecourt construe[s]allreasonableinferencesinfavorofthejuvenilecourtsfindings!#X0EX#XX0E...#!#Ԁ.#XUdX!#!XXUdԀ(!SaraM.v.SuperiorCourt(2005)36Cal.4th998, &"" #!m##XUdX!C#!XXUd1018;!InreJulieM.(1999)69Cal.App.4th41,46.)#!B##XUdX!#!XXUd Theclearandconvincing '## standardspecifiedinsection361.5,subdivision(b),isfortheedificationandguidanceofthetrialcourtandnotastandardforappellatereview.(SheilaS.v.SuperiorCourt(2000) )%% 84Cal.App.4th872,880881.) Whetherthetestatthetrialcourtispreponderanceoftheevidenceorclearandconvincingevidence,asubstantialevidencestandardof_##review +'' appliesonappeal.(InreMarkL.(2001)94Cal.App.4th573,581,fn.5;accord,_##Crail_##  v._##Blakely_##(1973)8Cal.3d744,750;InreHeidiT.(1978)87Cal.App.3d864,871.)  #XUdX!#!XXUd  Substantialevidencemustbeofponderablelegalsignificance.Itisnot  synonymouswithanyevidence.(_##Roddenberry_##Ԁv._##Roddenberry_##(1996)44Cal.App.4th  634,651.)Theevidencemustbereasonableinnature,credible,andofsolidvalue.(_##DiMartino_##Ԁv.Cityof_##Orinda_##(2000)80Cal.App.4th329,336.)(InreDakotaH.   (2005)132Cal.App.4th212,228.)#XUdX!2#Ԛ!XXUd Wereviewthetrialcourtsfindingsforsubstantial   evidence.[Citation.]Wedonot_##reweigh_##Ԁtheevidence,evaluatethecredibilityofwitnesses,orresolveevidentiaryconflicts.[Citation.]Thejudgmentwillbeupheldifitissupportedbysubstantialevidence,eventhoughsubstantialevidencetothecontraryalsoexistsandthetrialcourtmighthavereachedadifferentresulthaditbelievedotherevidence.!#X0EX#XX0E(Ibid.)#!##XUdX!#!XXUdԀ Ajudgmentwillbeupheldifitissupportedbysubstantialevidence,   eventhoughsubstantialevidencetothecontraryalsoexistandthetrialcourtmighthavereachedadifferentresulthaditbelievedotherevidence.!#X0EXz#XX0E(Id.atp.#!##XUdX!#!XXUdԀ230.)#XUdX!K#!XXUdԀ! Certainly,itis   possibletoidentify#!#manyharmsthatcouldcometopass.Butwithoutmoreevidence  thanwaspresentedinthiscase,suchharmsaremerelyspeculative.(!InreDavidM.  (2005)134Cal.App.4th822,#!#!830.)#!_##XUdX!#!XXUd    Onappeal,weviewtheevidenceinthelightmostfavorabletothetrialjudgesorder,drawingeveryreasonableinferenceandresolvingallconflictsinsupportofthejudgment.(Inre_##Misako_##ԀR.(1991)2Cal.App.4th538,545.)Anappellatecourtdoesnot  _##reweigh_##Ԁtheevidence.(SeeInreStephanieM.(1994)7Cal.4th295,318319.)Rather,  wemustdeterminewhetherthereissubstantialevidencefromwhichareasonabletrieroffactcouldbyclearandconvincingevidencefindafactualbasisforthefindingastothechilds_##adoptability_##.(InreBabyBoyL.(1994)24Cal.App.4th596,610.)(Inre  MarinaS.(2005)132Cal.App.4th158,165.)  #XUdX!#!XXUd  Appellatecourtcannotupholdthejudgmentbyrelyingontheoriesthejuvenilecourtrejected.(!Inre_##Isayah_##ԀC.(2004)118Cal.App.4th684,#!##XUdX!#!XXUd695696,699.)  !% 9 PREJUDICE:%95 !   Generally,errorsbythejuvenilecourtdonotrequirereversalofthejuvenilecourtordersunlesstherewasamiscarriageofjustice.#!##XUdX!#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0E(Inre_##Jesusa_##ԀV.(2004)32Cal.4th588, # #!N#!#X0EXm#XX0E624;#!##XUdX!S#ԚX0EXXXUdXX0EԀInre_##Celine_##ԀR.(2003)31Cal.4th45,59;#X0EX##XUdXXX0E#X0EXXXUdXX0EInreMelvinA.(2000)82Cal.App.4th $  1243,1252;Inre_##Kristin_##ԀH.(1996)46Cal.App.4th1635,1668;InreRonaldR.(1995) %!! 37Cal.App.4th1186,1195;seegenerally#!#Peoplev.Watson(1956)46Cal.2d818,836 &"" 837.)!ԀFailuretotransportaparentfromprisonisreviewedunderWatson.(Inre_##Jesusa_## '## V.(2004)32Cal.4th588,#!=#!#X0EX#XX0E624.)Failuretoappointconflictfreecounselfortheminor ($$ reviewedunderWatson.(Inre_##Celine_##ԀR.(2003)31Cal.4th45,59.)#X0EXp#XX0E#!.#! )%%    Aviolationofaparentssubstantiveorproceduraldueprocessrightsunderthe +'' FourteenthAmendmentarepresumedprejudicialunlessthestatecanshowbeyondareasonabledoubtthaterrorwasharmless.(InreVanessaM.(2006)138Cal.App.4th  1121,#!#!#X0EXt#XX0E1132[preventingparentfromtestifying];Inre_##Joann_##ԀE.(2002)104Cal.App.4th  347,359[appointmentofguardianadlitemwithoutadequatehearing];InreAngelaC.  (2002)99Cal.App.4th389,394[notice];InreCliftonV.(2001)93Cal.App.4th1400,  1406[unjustifieddenialofcontested388hearing];InreSaraD.(2001)87   Cal.App.4th661,673[appointmentofguardianadlitemwithouthearing];InreStacyT.   (1997)52Cal.App.4th1415,1426&fn.9[deniedrighttocrossexaminationandnoticeofappealrights];Inre_##Nemis_##ԀM.(1996)50Cal.App.4th1334,1355[crossexamination];   InreDollyD.(1995)41Cal.App.4th440,446447[crossexamination];InreAndrewS.   (1994)27Cal.App.4th541,547;InreMoniqueT.(1992)2Cal.App.4th1372,1377;In   reAmyM.(1991)232Cal.App.3d849,867868[presentwitnesses];#!M#!butseeDennyH.v.   SuperiorCourt(2005)131Cal.App.4th1501,#!/#!#X0EX#XX0E15141515[statingerrormustbeharmless   byonlyclearandconvincingevidenceindependencyproceedings];seegenerally#!#Chapmanv.California(1967)386U.S.18,24#XUdX! #!XXUd!.)    Butconstitutionalerrorrequiresreversalonlyifprocedureswerefundamentallyunfair.(Inre_##Meranda_##ԀP.(1997)56Cal.App.4th1143,1153;InreMalcolmD.(1996)  42Cal.App.4th904,919;_##Lassiter_##Ԁv.DSS(1981)452U.S.18,3233.)    Failurebythecourttoproperlyadviseaparentatahearingreversibleperse.(In  reJasmineG.(2005)127Cal.App.4th1109,#!Q#!#X0EX2#XX0E11151116;JudithP.v.SuperiorCourt  (2002)102Cal.App.4th535,558#X0EX#XX0E#!#!.)Butmostcourtshaveheldthatitwillnotresultina  reversalunlessprejudiceisshown.(See,e.g.,InreRonaldE.(1977)19Cal.3d315,  321;InreSabrinaH.(2007)149Cal.App.4th1403,#!#!#X0EX#XX0EԀ1420[questioningJudithP.inlight  ofInre_##Cerline_##ԀR.(2003)31#!$#!#X0EXf#XX0ECal.4th#!,##XUdX!n#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ45,5859;InreMoniqueT.(1992)2Cal.App.4th  1372,1378.)  Whileitistruethatnormallyanappellanthastheburdenofproducingarecordofthehearingsandordersthatcontaintheallegederror[citation],heretheallegederroristhatnohearingoccurred.Wecannotexpect[appellant]toproducearecordofsomethingthatdidnothappenor,ataminimum,wasnotreportedorenteredintheminutes.(_##Joann_##ԀE.(2002)104Cal.App.4th347,358,fn.10.) #   Cumulativeerror.(InreDavidD.(1994)28Cal.App.4th941[ oneerrorwas %!! compoundeduponanother,resultinginasituationanalogoustoputtingthesechildrenonatrainwithonlyonedestination];InreDavidC.(1984)152Cal.App.3d1189;Inre '## AnnaM.(1997)54Cal.App.4th463,469.) ($$   Remedy:Whenreverseandorder,remandforthecourttodeterminewhattodo,consideringthebestinterestsoftheminor.(Inre_##Isayah_##ԀC.(2004)118Cal.App.4th684, +'' #!#!#X0EX#XX0E701.)    Remedy:Denialofcontestedsection388hearingatpermanentplanhearingrequiresreversalofthepermanentplanorderaswell.(InreCliftonV.(2001)93  Cal.App.4th1400,1406.)% : WRITS:%:K   Trialcounselrepresentsparentduringthewrit.(_##Rayna_##ԀR.v.SuperiorCourt   (1993)20Cal.App.4th1398,1404[neednothavetranscript].)  Attorneyshouldnotfilewritifnotauthorizedbyparent.(LisaS.v.Superior   Court(1998)62Cal.App.4th604[parentmustsignthepetition];JaniceJ.v.Superior   Court(1997)55Cal.App.4th690;SuzanneJ.v.SuperiorCourt(1996)46Cal.App.4th   785,788;GuillermoG.v.SuperiorCourt(1995)33Cal.App.4th1168;InreAlmaB.   (1994)21Cal.App.4th1037.)  Attorneyneednotfileapetitionifheorshebelievestherearenoissuesofmerit.(SueE.v.SuperiorCourt(1997)54Cal.App.4th399,404;RonaldS.v.SuperiorCourt  (1995)34Cal.App.4th1467,14681469[no_##Wende_##writpetitions].)    Attorneywhofailstofilemeritoriouspetitionagainstclientswishrendersineffectiveassistanceofcounsel.(InreSadeC.(1996)13Cal.4th952;_##Cresse_##ԀS.v.  SuperiorCourt(1996)50Cal.App.4th947,956;GlenC.v.SuperiorCourt(2000)78  Cal.App.4th570.)  Failuretocomplywithformerrule39.1Bmayleadtodismissal.(_##Rayna_##ԀR.v.  SuperiorCourt(1993)20Cal.App.4th1378,1406[formwritisinsufficient];AnthonyD.  v.SuperiorCourt(1998)63Cal.App.4th149,157;_##Nahid_##ԀH.v.SuperiorCourt  (1997)53Cal.App.4th1051,1056;CherylS.v.SuperiorCourt(1996)51Cal.App.4th   1000,1005;_##Cresse_##ԀS.v.SuperiorCourt(1996)51Cal.App.4th947,956;JoyceG.v. ! SuperiorCourt(1995)38Cal.App.4th1501,1512[dismissalonproceduraldefault, " however,preservestheissueforappeal];GlenC.v.SuperiorCourt(2000)78 # Cal.App.4th570[andreportattorneytostatebar].)  Untimelywritdismissedandissuebarredonappeal.(JonathanM.v.Superior &"" Court(1995)39Cal.App.4th1826,18291830;JoyceG.v.SuperiorCourt(1995)38 '## Cal.App.4th1501,1506;RoxanneH.v.SuperiorCourt(1995)35Cal.App.4th1008, ($$ 10121013.)  Cannotraiseissuesinformerrule39.1Bpetitionthatoccurredinthehearing +'' beforethehearingsettingthepermanentplanhearing.(JoeB.v.SuperiorCourt(2002)  99Cal.App.4th23,27.)  Butcanraiseanyissueinwritwhichwouldreversethesettingofthepermanentplanhearing;thus,canraisefailuretogivenoticeunderICWA.(DwayneP.v.Superior  Court(2002)103#!#Cal.App.4th!Ԁ247,260.)    Issueraisedinwritpetitioncannotberaisedonappealifdecidedonthemerits.(InreCaseyD.(1999)70Cal.App.4th38,4647;InreJulieS.(1996)48Cal.App.4th   988,991[ifcourtissues_##OSC_##].)  Relieffromdefaultnoticeofintenttofilewrit.(JonathanM.v.SuperiorCourt   (1995)39Cal.App.4th1826[otherwisedismiss];InreCatherineW.(1998)68   Cal.App.4th716[same];KarlS.v.SuperiorCourt(1995)24Cal.App.4th1394,1404.)     Formerrule39.1B(l)and(o)isunconstitutional.Thecourtmustgiveawritten   opiniononeverywritpetition.(_##Meribel_##ԀM.v.SuperiorCourt(1998)61Cal.App.4th  1469.)  Thereisnoautomaticstaywhenfilingawritpetition.(InreBrandyR.(2007)  150#!#!#X0EX3 #XX0ECal.App.4th#!O##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ607,609611.)  % ; OTHER:%;d  Cancombinestatementofcaseandfact.(InreKimberlyF.(1997)56  Cal.App.4th519,522,fn.2.)  Sometimes,appellatecounselshoulduseonlyinitialsbecauseminorsnameisunusual.(InreS.D.(2002)99Cal.4th1068,1070,fn.1.)    Nocostsshallbeawardedindependencyappeals.(InreNadaR.(2001)89  Cal.App.4th1166,1181.)  #!#!#X0EX #XX0ECaliforniaRulesofCourt,rule#!##XUdX!#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ39(a)nolongersayscriminalrulesapply,butrules " 3738.6arenottheexclusiverulesthatapplyand onemustlookelsewhereintherulesofappellateproceduregeneralforrulesconcerningtopicsforwhichnospecialdependencyruleissetout.(InreJosiahZ.(2005)36Cal.4th664,#!N#!#X0EXm#XX0E675,fn.3.) %!! #! ##XUdX!6!#X0EXXXUdXX0E  Dependencyproceedingsarespecialproceedingsgovernedbytheirownrules '## andstatutes.[Citation.]Statutesapplicabletocivilcasesarenotapplicabletodependencyactionsunlessexpresslymade#X0EX!#XX0Eso.(InreJoshuaG.(2005)129Cal.App.4th )%% 189,#!!#!198.)Thus,the rulesapplicabletocivilcasesarenotapplicabletodependency *&& actionsunlessexpresslymadeso.Dependencyproceedingsinthejuvenilecourtare +'' specialproceedingsgovernedbytheirownrulesandstatutes.[Citations.]Unlessotherwisespecified,therequirementsoftheCivilCodeandtheCodeCivilofProceduredonotapply.[Citations.][Citations](InreShelleyJ.(1998)68Cal.App.4th322,328,  quotingInreJenniferR.(1993)14Cal.App.4th704,711.) However,intheabsenceof  a_##dispositive_##Ԁprovisioninthe#!o#WelfareandInstitutionsCode,wemaylooktothese  requirementsforguidance.(InreDanielS.(2004)115Cal.App.4th903,911.)(Inre   JosiahZ.(2005)36Cal.4th664,679;accordInreFranciscoW.(2006)139Cal.App.4th   695,707,fn.7.)#XUdX!#!XXUd  "[_##B]asic_##ԀappellateprinciplescodifiedinCodeofCivilProceduresections901   through923applyinjuveniledependencyproceedings,atleasttotheextentnotinconsistenttherewith.'(InreCassandraB.(2004)125Cal.App.4th199,208.)     PartIof!#X0EX#XX0ECodeofCivilProcedure#!V ##XUdX! #!XXUdapplyindependencyproceedings.(!InreMark   B.(2007)148#!W!#!#X0EX!#XX0ECal.App.4th#!!##XUdX!"#X0EXXXUdXX0EԀ61,#!~"##XUdX!"#!XXUd79.)   #XUdX!##